Andrew Hoberek
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 10%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gerald GraffDavid SterrittDavid SeedTimothy SweetPeter KnightRobert E. MasonSean McCannDouglas Field
- Topics
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism (5 papers)Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (3 papers)Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers)
- Journals
- The Modern Language ReviewCollege EnglishThe Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Andrew Hoberek
13 papers receiving 71 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 95
- Cultural Studies 25
- Sociology and Political Science 24
- Philosophy 22
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 13
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Hoberek
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Hoberek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Hoberek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Hoberek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Hoberek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Hoberek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Hoberek. The network helps show where Andrew Hoberek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Hoberek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Hoberek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Hoberek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Hoberek. Andrew Hoberek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Postmodern/Postwar and After: Rethinking American Literature | 18 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Liberal Antiliberalism: Mailer, O'connor, and the Gender Politics of Middle-Class Ressentiment | 1 |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Andrew Hoberek
Andrew Hoberek is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Music, having authored 20 papers that have together received 129 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (5 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (3 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (95 citations), Cultural Studies (25 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (13 citations). Andrew Hoberek has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald Graff, David Sterritt, David Seed, Timothy Sweet, Peter Knight, Robert E. Mason, Sean McCann, Douglas Field, Mary Ann Watson and Andrew Preston. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, College English and The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.