David Nirenberg
- Classics top 2%
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 4
- Medieval Iberian Studies 4
- History top 0.5%
- Medieval History and Crusades 10
- Sephardic Jews and Inquisition Studies 9
- Religious studies top 1%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 8
- Anthropology top 10%
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 4
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 8
- Religion and Society Interactions 3
- Co-authors
- Gavin I. LangmuirMarc SapersteinThomas F. GlickJames GivenKraig BeyerleinGeneviève ZubrzyckiHerbert L. KesslerJohn B. Freed
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryReligious studies
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)The American Historical Review (3 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
David Nirenberg
38 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Classics 73
- History 165
- Religious studies 76
- Philosophy 57
- Anthropology 37
Countries citing papers authored by David Nirenberg
This map shows the geographic impact of David Nirenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Nirenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Nirenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Nirenberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Nirenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Nirenberg. The network helps show where David Nirenberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 23 scholars most cited alongside David Nirenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | For Most Churchgoers, Controversy Between Religious Freedom and Public Health is Not Real | 2020 | 1 |
| 3 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 4 | Communities of Violence: Persecution of Minorities in the Middle Ages - Updated Edition | 2015 | 4 |
| 5 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 15 | Violence et minorités au Moyen Âge | 2001 | 2 |
| 16 | El concepto de raza en el estudio del antijudaísmo ibérico medieval | 2000 | 2 |
| 17 | 1997 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 27 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 2 |
About David Nirenberg
David Nirenberg is a scholar working on Classics, History and Religious studies, having authored 48 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval History and Crusades (10 papers), Sephardic Jews and Inquisition Studies (9 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (8 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (8 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (4 papers), Medieval Iberian Studies (4 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (73 citations), History (165 citations) and Religious studies (76 citations). David Nirenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gavin I. Langmuir, Marc Saperstein, Thomas F. Glick, James Given, Kraig Beyerlein, Geneviève Zubrzycki, Herbert L. Kessler, John B. Freed, Bernhard Jussen and Claude Gauvard. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.