Philo C. Wasburn
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Communication top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Co-authors
- Joshua MeyrowitzRobert E. DentonAnthony M. OrumMara H. WasburnWilliam HoynesJeremy TunstallLawrence C. SoleyJohn Spicer Nichols
- Topics
- Media Studies and Communication (9 papers)Social Media and Politics (7 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndonesia
In The Last Decade
Philo C. Wasburn
35 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Sociology and Political Science 863
- Communication 762
- Political Science and International Relations 254
- Literature and Literary Theory 220
- Philosophy 195
Countries citing papers authored by Philo C. Wasburn
This map shows the geographic impact of Philo C. Wasburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philo C. Wasburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philo C. Wasburn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philo C. Wasburn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philo C. Wasburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philo C. Wasburn. The network helps show where Philo C. Wasburn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philo C. Wasburn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philo C. Wasburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philo C. Wasburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philo C. Wasburn. Philo C. Wasburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Media bias? : a comparative study of Time, Newsweek, the National review, and the progressive coverage of domestic social issues, 1975-2000 | 4 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Mass media and politics | 8 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior.breakdown → | 1209 |
| 12 | 251 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | Research in political sociology : a research annual | 7 |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Philo C. Wasburn
Philo C. Wasburn is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (9 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (762 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (220 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (863 citations). Philo C. Wasburn has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Joshua Meyrowitz, Robert E. Denton, Anthony M. Orum, Mara H. Wasburn, William Hoynes, Jeremy Tunstall, Lawrence C. Soley, John Spicer Nichols, Harlan Hahn and Charles H. Levine. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.