Kate Nash
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- John CornerCraig HightVikki BellAlan ScottEdwin AmentaJulian PetleyDes FreedmanGholam Khiabany
- Topics
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (11 papers)Cinema and Media Studies (10 papers)Law in Society and Culture (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Kate Nash
53 papers receiving 946 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Sociology and Political Science 580
- Political Science and International Relations 239
- Communication 194
- Economics and Econometrics 136
- Gender Studies 106
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Nash. The network helps show where Kate Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Nash
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Nash. Kate Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | Liberalism in Neoliberal Times: Dimensions, Contradictions, Limits | 9 |
| 4 | New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses | 24 |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | Global Capitalism and Human Rights | 1 |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | Contemporary Political Sociology: globalization, politics, power | 34 |
| 12 | Stealing Moments: Tom Zubrycki's 'Molly and Mobarak' | 0 |
| 13 | Power, state and inequality | 1 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | Readings in contemporary political sociology | 44 |
| 19 | Universal Difference: Feminism and the Liberal Undecidability of "Women" | 8 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Kate Nash
Kate Nash is a scholar working on Law, History and Communication, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (11 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (10 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (194 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (95 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (580 citations). Kate Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include John Corner, Craig Hight, Vikki Bell, Alan Scott, Edwin Amenta, Julian Petley, Des Freedman and Gholam Khiabany. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, Sociology and Theory Culture & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.