Danielle McCarthy

16 papers receiving 914 citations

Peers

Danielle McCarthy
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Applied Psychology 481
  • Literature and Literary Theory 255
  • General Decision Sciences 42
  • Health 85
  • Physiology 216
Replace Kristel M. Gallagher with:
Kristel M. Gallagher United States
Loes T. E. Kessels Netherlands
Judith Pizarro United States
Kristina Wilson United States
Diane B. Francis United States
Elizabeth A. Pomery United States
Amy E. Houlihan United States
Monica Reis-Bergan United States
Sally Dunlop Australia
Jhon Wlaschin United States
Danielle McCarthy relative to Kristel M. Gallagher United States Kristel M. Gallagher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Kristel M. Gallagher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle McCarthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle McCarthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle McCarthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle McCarthy. The network helps show where Danielle McCarthy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle McCarthy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle McCarthy Line = papers co-authored together Danielle McCarthy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2001176
2 2003168
3 2003164
4 2006161
5 2001160
6 202035
7 202134
8 201915
9 201114
10 202112
11 20207
12 20196
13 19974
14 20233
15 20252
16 20201
17 20250
18 20250

About Danielle McCarthy

Danielle McCarthy is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Biological Psychiatry and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 18 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers) and Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (481 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (255 citations), General Decision Sciences (42 citations), Health (85 citations) and Physiology (216 citations). Danielle McCarthy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Anne Marie Apanovitch, Peter Salovey, Megan E. Piper, Timothy R. Baker, Judith Pizarro, Tamera R. Schneider, Alexander J. Rothman, Jayne V. Woodside, Michelle C. McKinley and Moira Dean. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Nutrients, European Journal of Endocrinology and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026