Daniela Altavilla

472 citations
30 papers · 328 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Altavilla

27 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Daniela Altavilla
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Applied Psychology 46
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 99
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 64
  • Literature and Literary Theory 41
  • Clinical Psychology 62
Replace Jennifer Yih with:
Jennifer Yih United States
Benjamin Stillerman United States
Michał Parzuchowski Poland
Kinga Lachowicz‐Tabaczek Poland
Yossi Hasson Israel
Xiaotian Sheng China
Spike W.S. Lee United States
Hiroaki Morio Japan
Adrien Mierop Belgium
Stefanie Nickel Germany
Daniela Altavilla relative to Jennifer Yih United States Jennifer Yih's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jennifer Yih · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Altavilla

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Altavilla's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Altavilla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Altavilla more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Altavilla

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Altavilla. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Altavilla. The network helps show where Daniela Altavilla may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Altavilla, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Altavilla Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Altavilla links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016129
2 201328
3 201724
4 201419
5 201718
6 201814
7 202010
8 20188
9 20218
10 20208
11 20227
12 20236
13 20186
14 20206
15 20215
16 20225
17 20225
18 20214
19 20233
20 20223

About Daniela Altavilla

Daniela Altavilla is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (46 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (64 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (41 citations) and Clinical Psychology (62 citations). Daniela Altavilla has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paola Aceto, Carlo Lai, Marco Cecchini, Massimiliano Luciani, Letizia Palumbo, Ines Adornetti, Alessandra Chiera, Gaia Romana Pellicano, Renata Tambelli and Francesco Ferretti. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Neuroscience, Frontiers in Psychology, Experimental Brain Research and Language & Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact