Benjamin Stillerman

500 total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 340 citations indexed

About

Benjamin Stillerman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Stillerman has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 340 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Stillerman's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). Benjamin Stillerman is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). Benjamin Stillerman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Benjamin Stillerman's co-authors include Clifford Nass, Roy Pea, Michael Zhou, Aman Kumar, Holden Bamford, Steven Yang, Kirsten Weber, Gina R. Kuperberg, Ellen Lau and Eric C. Fields and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Stillerman

5 papers receiving 317 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls.

2012 267 citations Roy Pea, Clifford Nass et al. Developmental Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Benjamin Stillerman United States	5	203	118	83	70	55	5	340
Tyrone L. Burleigh Australia	11	477 2.3×	225 1.9×	86 1.0×	71 1.0×	51 0.9×	22	573
Tathiana Baczynski Brazil	4	330 1.6×	166 1.4×	51 0.6×	58 0.8×	35 0.6×	5	420
Xiaotian Sheng China	7	190 0.9×	75 0.6×	62 0.7×	68 1.0×	58 1.1×	11	368
Chiara Imperato Italy	9	192 0.9×	47 0.4×	26 0.3×	35 0.5×	74 1.3×	23	271
Ida Sergi Italy	10	189 0.9×	103 0.9×	74 0.9×	113 1.6×	85 1.5×	21	466
Angelica B. Ortiz de Gortari United Kingdom	14	275 1.4×	103 0.9×	95 1.1×	55 0.8×	45 0.8×	28	443
Xuemei Gao China	9	199 1.0×	108 0.9×	50 0.6×	57 0.8×	135 2.5×	20	352
Héctor Fúster Spain	9	387 1.9×	173 1.5×	19 0.2×	36 0.5×	51 0.9×	14	449
Federica Sibilla Italy	7	164 0.8×	38 0.3×	32 0.4×	32 0.5×	34 0.6×	10	260
Zoë Fowler United Kingdom	8	56 0.3×	152 1.3×	41 0.5×	65 0.9×	39 0.7×	17	333

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Stillerman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Stillerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Stillerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Stillerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Stillerman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Stillerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Stillerman. The network helps show where Benjamin Stillerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Stillerman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Stillerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Stillerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Stillerman. Benjamin Stillerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Schultner, David, Benjamin Stillerman, Björn Lindström, et al.. (2024). Transmission of societal stereotypes to individual-level prejudice through instrumental learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(45). e2414518121–e2414518121. 6 indexed citations

2.

Fields, Eric C., et al.. (2019). Functional MRI reveals evidence of a self-positivity bias in the medial prefrontal cortex during the comprehension of social vignettes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 14(6). 613–621. 21 indexed citations

3.

Freeman, Jonathan B., Ryan M. Stolier, Jeffrey A. Brooks, & Benjamin Stillerman. (2018). The neural representational geometry of social perception. Current Opinion in Psychology. 24. 83–91. 16 indexed citations

4.

Weber, Kirsten, Ellen Lau, Benjamin Stillerman, & Gina R. Kuperberg. (2016). The Yin and the Yang of Prediction: An fMRI Study of Semantic Predictive Processing. PLoS ONE. 11(3). e0148637–e0148637. 30 indexed citations

5.

Pea, Roy, Clifford Nass, Aman Kumar, et al.. (2012). Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls.. Developmental Psychology. 48(2). 327–336. 267 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact