Benjamin Stillerman
Impact in
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Face Recognition and Perception 2
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 1
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 1
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 1
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 2
- Primate Behavior and Ecology 1
- Co-authors
- Aman Kumar (1 shared paper)Roy Pea (1 shared paper)Michael Zhou (1 shared paper)Steven Yang (1 shared paper)Clifford Nass (1 shared paper)Holden Bamford (1 shared paper)Kirsten Weber (2 shared papers)Gina R. Kuperberg (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Developmental Psychology (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Current Opinion in Psychology (1 paper)Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSweden
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Stillerman
5 papers receiving 317 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Communication 44
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
- Information Systems and Management 36
- Applied Psychology 25
- Sociology and Political Science 203
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Stillerman
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Stillerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Stillerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Stillerman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Stillerman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Stillerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Stillerman. The network helps show where Benjamin Stillerman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Stillerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 267 |
| 2 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 6 |
About Benjamin Stillerman
Benjamin Stillerman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 5 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper), Neuroscience and Music Perception (1 paper) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (44 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations), Information Systems and Management (36 citations), Applied Psychology (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (203 citations). Benjamin Stillerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Aman Kumar, Roy Pea, Michael Zhou, Steven Yang, Clifford Nass, Holden Bamford, Kirsten Weber, Gina R. Kuperberg, Ellen Lau and Jonathan B. Freeman. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE, Current Opinion in Psychology and Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.