Daniel Z. Meyer

596 total citations
10 papers, 411 citations indexed

About

Daniel Z. Meyer is a scholar working on Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Z. Meyer has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 411 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Education, 3 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Z. Meyer's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (8 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (3 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers). Daniel Z. Meyer is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (8 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (3 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers). Daniel Z. Meyer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel Z. Meyer's co-authors include Leanne M. Avery and Allison Antink‐Meyer and has published in prestigious journals such as Research in Science Education, Studies in Science Education and School Science and Mathematics.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Z. Meyer

10 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Z. Meyer United States	5	198	63	58	57	55	10	411
Leanne M. Avery United States	8	306 1.5×	73 1.2×	49 0.8×	138 2.4×	58 1.1×	18	570
Joellen Killion Qatar	10	542 2.7×	40 0.6×	118 2.0×	34 0.6×	31 0.6×	43	674
Kerstin Carlson Le Floch United States	9	410 2.1×	67 1.1×	75 1.3×	48 0.8×	25 0.5×	22	605
José Felipe Martínez United States	14	609 3.1×	56 0.9×	80 1.4×	28 0.5×	18 0.3×	37	743
Ben Kelcey United States	15	432 2.2×	44 0.7×	282 4.9×	26 0.5×	24 0.4×	42	728
Fernando López-Noguero Spain	9	107 0.5×	63 1.0×	19 0.3×	10 0.2×	38 0.7×	48	309
Patricia D. Morrell United States	12	306 1.5×	21 0.3×	94 1.6×	76 1.3×	10 0.2×	32	419
Michael F. Burnett United States	10	125 0.6×	68 1.1×	12 0.2×	59 1.0×	38 0.7×	44	492
Omolola A. Adedokun United States	13	360 1.8×	48 0.8×	92 1.6×	71 1.2×	98 1.8×	36	714
Doris Fuster-Guillén Peru	9	206 1.0×	58 0.9×	25 0.4×	11 0.2×	40 0.7×	50	469

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Z. Meyer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Z. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Z. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Z. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Z. Meyer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Z. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Z. Meyer. The network helps show where Daniel Z. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Z. Meyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Z. Meyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Z. Meyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Z. Meyer. Daniel Z. Meyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Meyer, Daniel Z.. (2017). A Student-Centered, Inquiry-Based Approach to Young’s Double-Slit Experiment (and Other Investigations of Light’s Wave Character). The Physics Teacher. 55(3). 159–163. 4 indexed citations

2.

Antink‐Meyer, Allison & Daniel Z. Meyer. (2016). Science Teachers’ Misconceptions in Science and Engineering Distinctions: Reflections on Modern Research Examples. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 27(6). 625–647. 49 indexed citations

3.

Meyer, Daniel Z., et al.. (2012). Eight Ways to Do Inquiry.. The Science Teacher. 79(6). 40–44. 1 indexed citations

4.

Meyer, Daniel Z.. (2012). Designing Design Challenges: Getting the Details Right.. The Science Teacher. 79(2). 58–62. 1 indexed citations

5.

Meyer, Daniel Z., et al.. (2012). Eight Ways to Do Inquiry: A Study of over 300 Inquiry Activities Recommends Eight Models for the Classroom. The Science Teacher. 79(6). 40. 1 indexed citations

6.

Avery, Leanne M. & Daniel Z. Meyer. (2012). Teaching Science as Science Is Practiced: Opportunities and Limits for Enhancing Preservice Elementary Teachers' Self‐Efficacy for Science and Science Teaching. School Science and Mathematics. 112(7). 395–409. 103 indexed citations

7.

Meyer, Daniel Z., et al.. (2011). A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Problems in Designing Inquiry Activities. Research in Science Education. 43(1). 57–76. 21 indexed citations

8.

Meyer, Daniel Z. & Leanne M. Avery. (2010). Why Inquiry Is Inherently Difficult. . . and Some Ways to Make It Easier. Science educator. 19(1). 26–32. 2 indexed citations

9.

Meyer, Daniel Z. & Leanne M. Avery. (2010). A third use of sociology of scientific knowledge: a lens for studying teacher practice. Studies in Science Education. 46(2). 153–178. 2 indexed citations

10.

Meyer, Daniel Z. & Leanne M. Avery. (2008). Excel as a Qualitative Data Analysis Tool. Field Methods. 21(1). 91–112. 227 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact