Daniel van den Hoek

27 papers receiving 516 citations

Hit Papers

Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and ...202420262025202450100150

Peers

Daniel van den Hoek
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 191
  • Physiology 144
  • Clinical Psychology 70
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 65
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 58
Replace Jemima Spathis with:
Jemima Spathis Australia
Michael Tse Hong Kong
Lucrezia Zuccarelli Italy
Christian Campos‐Jara Chile
Ronald Gellish United States
Aldo Seffrin Brazil
Pablo Jorge Marcos-Pardo Spain
Tomáš Větrovský Czechia
Juan Á. Párraga Montilla Spain
Eric V. Neufeld United States
Daniel van den Hoek relative to Jemima Spathis Australia Jemima Spathis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jemima Spathis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel van den Hoek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel van den Hoek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel van den Hoek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel van den Hoek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel van den Hoek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel van den Hoek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel van den Hoek. The network helps show where Daniel van den Hoek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel van den Hoek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel van den Hoek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel van den Hoek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel van den Hoek. Daniel van den Hoek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 6
5
Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsbreakdown →
178
6 1
7 6
8 7
9 4
10 2
11 4
12 17
13 32
14 3
15 13
16 15
17 6
18 5
19 116
20 7

About Daniel van den Hoek

Daniel van den Hoek is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (18 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (18 papers) and Sport Psychology and Performance (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (191 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (65 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (31 citations). Daniel van den Hoek has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Latella, Ester Cerin, David W. Barnett, Anthony Barnett, Wei‐Peng Teo, Jemima Spathis, Chris Lonsdale, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Taren Sanders and Lisa Pagano. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, BMJ and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026