Adam Field

37 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Adam Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 249
  • Rehabilitation 45
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 44
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 65
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 3
Replace Jaime Fernández Fernández with:
Jaime Fernández Fernández Spain
Guilherme Passos Ramos Brazil
Carlos Puente Spain
Athanasios Mandroukas Greece
Esther Morencos Spain
Thomas Sawczuk United Kingdom
Chris McLellan Australia
Kosmas Christoulas Greece
Karol Gryko Poland
João Paulo Borin Brazil
Adam Field relative to Jaime Fernández Fernández Spain Jaime Fernández Fernández's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.2×
Jaime Fernández Fernández · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Field. The network helps show where Adam Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam Field Line = papers co-authored together Adam Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202152
2 202233
3 201931
4 202128
5 202222
6 202019
7 202413
8 202211
9 201910
10 202110
11 20219
12 20218
13 20208
14 20237
15 20227
16 20226
17 20226
18 20226
19 20235
20 20215

About Adam Field

Adam Field is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cell Biology, Rehabilitation and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (36 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (28 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (14 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (10 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (6 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (6 papers), Genetics and Physical Performance (2 papers) and Physical Education and Training Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (249 citations), Rehabilitation (45 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (44 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (65 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (3 citations). Adam Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Hugo Sarmento, Liam D. Harper, Robert J. Naughton, António J. Figueiredo, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Diogo V. Martinho, Richard Page, Ana M. Faria, Hadi Nobarı and Élvio Rúbio Gouveia. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Sport, International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, Journal of Human Kinetics, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact