Daniel S. Beasley

613 total citations
22 papers, 460 citations indexed

About

Daniel S. Beasley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel S. Beasley has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 460 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Daniel S. Beasley's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (5 papers). Daniel S. Beasley is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (5 papers). Daniel S. Beasley collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel S. Beasley's co-authors include Fred H. Bess, Dan F. Konkle, William F. Rintelmann, Daniel J. Orchik, Gene W. Bratt, Walter H. Manning, Gordon Z. Greenberg, Norman W. Bray and Willard R. Zemlin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics and International Journal of Audiology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel S. Beasley

20 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel S. Beasley United States 10 321 134 120 103 85 22 460
Robert L. McCroskey United States 9 245 0.8× 85 0.6× 122 1.0× 78 0.8× 24 0.3× 12 343
Paul H. Ptacek United States 7 146 0.5× 230 1.7× 39 0.3× 128 1.2× 53 0.6× 10 485
Kim A. Wilcox United States 13 160 0.5× 205 1.5× 155 1.3× 68 0.7× 30 0.4× 28 483
Joseph Smaldino United States 13 564 1.8× 83 0.6× 240 2.0× 378 3.7× 113 1.3× 37 727
Donna Geffner United States 10 342 1.1× 125 0.9× 208 1.7× 42 0.4× 22 0.3× 21 450
Thomas G. Giolas United States 10 287 0.9× 75 0.6× 135 1.1× 128 1.2× 63 0.7× 19 383
Michael Kiefte Canada 14 308 1.0× 270 2.0× 57 0.5× 68 0.7× 163 1.9× 40 597
Huiwen Goy Canada 11 236 0.7× 189 1.4× 56 0.5× 155 1.5× 47 0.6× 22 441
Sneha V. Bharadwaj United States 9 205 0.6× 124 0.9× 138 1.1× 24 0.2× 40 0.5× 29 319
Mark Hedrick United States 16 504 1.6× 223 1.7× 62 0.5× 154 1.5× 166 2.0× 54 628

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Beasley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Beasley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Beasley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Beasley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Beasley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Beasley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Beasley. The network helps show where Daniel S. Beasley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel S. Beasley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel S. Beasley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel S. Beasley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel S. Beasley. Daniel S. Beasley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1984). Comparison of the Sensitivity of Two Psychological Scaling Methods Employed in the Rating of Rate and Duration Characteristics of Esophageal Speakers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 36(4). 199–205. 1 indexed citations
2.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1981). Aging, communication processes and disorders. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 156 indexed citations
3.
Orchik, Daniel J., et al.. (1981). Children's Performance on a Binaural Fusion Task. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 24(4). 520–525. 4 indexed citations
4.
Beasley, Daniel S., Gene W. Bratt, & William F. Rintelmann. (1980). Intelligibility of Time-Compressed Sentential Stimuli. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 23(4). 722–731. 28 indexed citations
5.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1978). Discrimination of Time-Altered Sentential Approximations and Monosyllables by Children with Reading Problems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 21(3). 497–506. 15 indexed citations
6.
Konkle, Dan F., Daniel S. Beasley, & Fred H. Bess. (1977). Intelligibility of Time-Altered Speech in Relation to Chronological Aging. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 20(1). 108–115. 96 indexed citations
7.
Manning, Walter H., et al.. (1977). The Performance of Children with Auditory Perceptual Disorders on a Time-Compressed Speech Discrimination Measure. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 42(1). 77–84. 20 indexed citations
8.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1976). Use of Frequency-Shifted/Time-Compressed Speech with Hearing-Impaired Children. International Journal of Audiology. 15(5). 395–406. 15 indexed citations
9.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1976). Children’s Perception of Time-Compressed Speech on Two Measures of Speech Discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 41(2). 216–225. 21 indexed citations
10.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1976). Lead and Lag Effects Associated with the Staggered Spondaic Word Test. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 19(3). 572–577. 6 indexed citations
11.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1976). Children's Perception of Temporally Distorted Sentential Approximations of Varying Length. International Journal of Audiology. 15(4). 315–325. 1 indexed citations
12.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1975). Verbal Coding Strategies Used by Hearing-Impaired Individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 18(3). 559–570. 21 indexed citations
13.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1975). Oral stereognosis: Effect of varying form set, answer type, and retention time. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 4(2). 159–167. 1 indexed citations
14.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1974). Auditory assembly of CVCs by children with normal and defective articulation. Journal of Communication Disorders. 7(2). 127–133. 3 indexed citations
15.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1973). Auditory Reassembly Abilities of Black and White First- and Third-Grade Children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 16(2). 213–221. 5 indexed citations
16.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1973). Auditory Analysis Of Temporally Distorted Sentential Approximations. International Journal of Audiology. 12(4). 262–271. 4 indexed citations
17.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1973). Experimenter bias and speech pathologists' evaluation of children's language skills. Journal of Communication Disorders. 6(2). 93–101. 4 indexed citations
18.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1973). Auditory Analysis Of Temporally Distorted Sentential Approximations. International Journal of Audiology. 12(4). 262–271.
19.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1972). Intelligibility of Time-Compressed CNC Monosyllables. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 15(2). 340–350. 40 indexed citations
20.
Beasley, Daniel S., et al.. (1969). The Effects of Frequency Division on Speech Identification in Children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 12(2). 413–422. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026