Mark Hedrick

843 total citations
54 papers, 628 citations indexed

About

Mark Hedrick is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Hedrick has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 628 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 16 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Mark Hedrick's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (42 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (18 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (15 papers). Mark Hedrick is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (42 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (18 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (15 papers). Mark Hedrick collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Denmark. Mark Hedrick's co-authors include Ashley W. Harkrider, Patrick N. Plyler, Mary Sue Younger, Ralph N. Ohde, Walt Jesteadt, Arlene Earley Carney, Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, James W. Thelin, J. Tampas and Aaron T. Buss and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Mark Hedrick

50 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Hedrick United States 16 504 223 166 160 154 54 628
Alexander J. Billig United Kingdom 12 470 0.9× 97 0.4× 57 0.3× 204 1.3× 149 1.0× 16 582
Daniel Fogerty United States 16 726 1.4× 282 1.3× 382 2.3× 140 0.9× 290 1.9× 66 817
Shawn L. Nissen United States 14 239 0.5× 441 2.0× 174 1.0× 38 0.2× 159 1.0× 31 761
Joanna H. Lowenstein United States 19 770 1.5× 258 1.2× 157 0.9× 164 1.0× 197 1.3× 50 982
Justin M. Aronoff United States 12 529 1.0× 54 0.2× 181 1.1× 262 1.6× 298 1.9× 40 566
C. L. Thompson United States 10 380 0.8× 211 0.9× 60 0.4× 83 0.5× 75 0.5× 22 421
J. Verschuure Netherlands 12 265 0.5× 47 0.2× 112 0.7× 166 1.0× 155 1.0× 20 381
Shilpi Banerjee India 6 677 1.3× 86 0.4× 139 0.8× 360 2.3× 403 2.6× 13 762
Jenna Cunningham United States 8 843 1.7× 261 1.2× 52 0.3× 274 1.7× 96 0.6× 12 919
Barrie A. Edmonds United Kingdom 10 509 1.0× 91 0.4× 146 0.9× 79 0.5× 157 1.0× 13 555

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hedrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hedrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hedrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hedrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hedrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hedrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hedrick. The network helps show where Mark Hedrick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Hedrick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Hedrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Hedrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Hedrick. Mark Hedrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hedrick, Mark, et al.. (2024). Unveiling the Role of Oxidative Stress in Cochlear Hair Cell Death: Prospective Phytochemical Therapeutics against Sensorineural Hearing Loss. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 25(8). 4272–4272. 6 indexed citations
2.
Hedrick, Mark, et al.. (2024). Reaction time for correct identification of vowels in consonant-vowel syllables and of vowel segments. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1).
4.
Harkrider, Ashley W., et al.. (2020). Click-evoked and speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses from individuals with multiple sclerosis. Neuroscience Letters. 740. 135460–135460. 6 indexed citations
5.
Erickson, Molly L., et al.. (2020). Multidimensional Timbre Spaces of Cochlear Implant Vocoded and Non-vocoded Synthetic Female Singing Voices. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14. 307–307. 7 indexed citations
6.
McCarthy, Jillian, et al.. (2019). Knowledge and experiences with augmentative and alternative communication by paediatric nurses: a pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 16(6). 567–579. 12 indexed citations
8.
Plyler, Patrick N., et al.. (2017). The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 30(2). 103–114. 3 indexed citations
9.
Hedrick, Mark, Il Joon Moon, Jihwan Woo, & Jong-Ho Won. (2016). Effects of Physiological Internal Noise on Model Predictions of Concurrent Vowel Identification for Normal-Hearing Listeners. PLoS ONE. 11(2). e0149128–e0149128. 1 indexed citations
10.
Casenhiser, Devin M., et al.. (2016). Effects of language experience on the discrimination of the Portuguese palatal lateral by nonnative listeners. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 30(8). 1–15. 1 indexed citations
11.
Johnstone, Patti M., et al.. (2015). Auditory and visual localization accuracy in young children and adults. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 79(6). 844–851. 7 indexed citations
12.
Plyler, Patrick N., et al.. (2015). Comparison of Multichannel Wide Dynamic Range Compression and ChannelFree Processing Strategies on Consonant Recognition. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 26(7). 607–614. 3 indexed citations
13.
Hedrick, Mark, Junghwa Bahng, Deborah von Hapsburg, & Mary Sue Younger. (2011). Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology. 50(8). 540–547. 13 indexed citations
14.
Harkrider, Ashley W., Patrick N. Plyler, & Mark Hedrick. (2008). Effects of Hearing Loss and Spectral Shaping on Identification and Neural Response Patterns of Stop-Consonant Stimuli in Young Adults. Ear and Hearing. 30(1). 31–42. 16 indexed citations
15.
Hedrick, Mark & Mary Sue Younger. (2007). Perceptual Weighting of Stop Consonant Cues by Normal and Impaired Listeners in Reverberation Versus Noise. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 50(2). 254–269. 23 indexed citations
16.
Valentine, Daniel T., Mark Hedrick, & Lori A. Swanson. (2006). Effect of an Auditory Training Program on Reading, Phoneme Awareness, and Language. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 103(1). 183–196. 11 indexed citations
17.
Harkrider, Ashley W., Patrick N. Plyler, & Mark Hedrick. (2005). Effects of age and spectral shaping on perception and neural representation of stop consonant stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology. 116(9). 2153–2164. 57 indexed citations
18.
Tampas, J., Ashley W. Harkrider, & Mark Hedrick. (2005). Neurophysiological Indices of Speech and Nonspeech Stimulus Processing. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 48(5). 1147–1164. 27 indexed citations
19.
Harkrider, Ashley W. & Mark Hedrick. (2004). Acute effect of nicotine on auditory gating in smokers and non-smokers. Hearing Research. 202(1-2). 114–128. 62 indexed citations
20.
Hedrick, Mark & Mary Sue Younger. (2003). Labeling of /s/ and /ʃ/ by Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing, Revisited. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 46(3). 636–648. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026