Daniel Powers

15 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Daniel Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Gender Studies 103
  • Demography 104
  • Health 52
  • Statistics and Probability 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 164
Replace Vida Maralani with:
Vida Maralani United States
Fabrice Etilé France
Jonas Helgertz Sweden
Lisa Calderwood United Kingdom
Akbar Aghajanian United States
Liliya Leopold Germany
Lucky M. Tedrow United States
Dana Garbarski United States
Paraskevi Peristera Sweden
Daniel Kuehnle Germany
Daniel Powers relative to Vida Maralani United States Vida Maralani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Vida Maralani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Powers. The network helps show where Daniel Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Powers Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1992179
2 200983
3 201835
4 201629
5 199227
6 202016
7 202216
8 201914
9 201912
10 200810
11 19928
12 20206
13 20235
14 20201
15 20191
16 20230
17 20220

About Daniel Powers

Daniel Powers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Information Systems, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (1 paper), Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper) and Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (103 citations), Demography (104 citations), Health (52 citations), Statistics and Probability (36 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (164 citations). Daniel Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Charles F. Manski, Gary D. Sandefur, Sara McLanahan, Debra Umberson, Hui Liu, Catherine Cubbin, Connor M. Sheehan, Ryan K. Masters, Christopher Winship and James S. Hodges. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, PLoS ONE, American Journal of Sociology, Journal of Health and Social Behavior and Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact