Daniel M. Brinks

30 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel M. Brinks
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Development 121
  • Law 292
  • Political Science and International Relations 653
  • Sociology and Political Science 755
  • Public Administration 39
Replace C. Neal Tate with:
C. Neal Tate United States
Oona A. Hathaway United States
Celina Souza Brazil
David L. Richards United States
Wade M. Cole United States
Julio Faúndez United Kingdom
Fernando Luiz Abrucio Brazil
Rachel E. Stern United States
Jeffrey K. Staton United States
Aurel Croissant Germany
Daniel M. Brinks relative to C. Neal Tate United States C. Neal Tate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. Neal Tate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Brinks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Brinks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Brinks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Brinks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Brinks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Brinks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Brinks. The network helps show where Daniel M. Brinks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Brinks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel M. Brinks Line = papers co-authored together Daniel M. Brinks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006296
2 2008157
3 2001142
4 201986
5 200367
6 200759
7 202058
8 201451
9 198741
10
Judicial Reform and Independence in Brazil and Argentina: The Beginning of a New Millennium?
200533
11 200127
12 201826
13 201722
14 201920
15 201419
16 201518
17 201818
18 201213
19
Inequality and the Rule of Law
201011
20
'Faithful Servants of the Regime' - The Brazilian Constitutional Court’s Role under the 1988 Constitution
200911

About Daniel M. Brinks

Daniel M. Brinks is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Development, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (20 papers), Human Rights and Development (10 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (9 papers), International Development and Aid (5 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (5 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (121 citations), Law (292 citations), Political Science and International Relations (653 citations), Sociology and Political Science (755 citations) and Public Administration (39 citations). Daniel M. Brinks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Michael Coppedge, Varun Gauri, Aníbal Pérez‐Liñán, Scott Mainwaring, Steven Levitsky, María Victoria Murillo, William E. Forbath, Karen Engle, Julia Dehm and Bruce M. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives on Politics, Comparative Political Studies, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Annual Review of Law and Social Science and Revista de ciencia política.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact