C. Neal Tate
- Law top 0.05%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 11
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 5
- Development top 1%
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 3
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 3
-
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 2
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 3
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 2
-
- Philippine History and Culture 3
C. Neal Tate
25 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Law 578
- Development 190
- Political Science and International Relations 807
- Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 430
Countries citing papers authored by C. Neal Tate
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Neal Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Neal Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Neal Tate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Neal Tate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Neal Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Neal Tate. The network helps show where C. Neal Tate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside C. Neal Tate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Governments of the world : a global guide to citizens' rights and responsibilities | 2006 | 3 |
| 2 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 3 | Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976-1993breakdown → | 1999 | 472 |
| 4 | 1994 | 17 | |
| 5 | Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysisbreakdown → | 1994 | 674 |
| 6 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 44 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 29 | |
| 9 | Comparative judicial review and public policy | 1992 | 20 |
| 10 | 1991 | 93 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 19 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 186 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 20 | The social background, political recruitment, and decision-making of the Philippine Supreme Court justices, 1901-1968 | 1970 | 6 |
About C. Neal Tate
C. Neal Tate is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (11 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (5 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (578 citations), Development (190 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (807 citations). C. Neal Tate has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven C. Poe, Linda Camp Keith, Roger Handberg, Stacia L. Haynie, Donald W. Jackson and John Paul Ryan. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.