Daniel M. Birk
Impact in
- Surgery top 10%
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
-
- Anatomy and Medical Technology
Papers in
- Surgery 8
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 4
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 3
- Surgical Simulation and Training 2
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 3
- Co-authors
- Rabih A. Chaer (2 shared papers)Peter L. Faries (1 shared paper)James F. McKinsey (1 shared paper)Brian G. DeRubertis (1 shared paper)K. Craig Kent (1 shared paper)Nicholas J. Morrissey (1 shared paper)Harry L. Bush (1 shared paper)John Karwowski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- World Neurosurgery (2 papers)Pediatric Neurosurgery (2 papers)Global Spine Journal (1 paper)Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (1 paper)Progress in neurological surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Daniel M. Birk
12 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Surgery 310
- Biomedical Engineering 171
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 85
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 64
- Physiology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel M. Birk
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel M. Birk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel M. Birk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel M. Birk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel M. Birk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel M. Birk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel M. Birk. The network helps show where Daniel M. Birk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel M. Birk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 207 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 113 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 2 |
About Daniel M. Birk
Daniel M. Birk is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (1 paper) and Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (310 citations), Biomedical Engineering (171 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (85 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (64 citations) and Physiology (62 citations). Daniel M. Birk has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Rabih A. Chaer, Peter L. Faries, James F. McKinsey, Brian G. DeRubertis, K. Craig Kent, Nicholas J. Morrissey, Harry L. Bush, John Karwowski, Sophia Lin and Joel E. Barbato. Their work appears in journals such as World Neurosurgery, Pediatric Neurosurgery, Global Spine Journal, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery and Progress in neurological surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.