Countries where authors publish in Pediatric Neurosurgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pediatric Neurosurgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pediatric Neurosurgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pediatric Neurosurgery more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Pediatric Neurosurgery
This network shows the impact of papers published in Pediatric Neurosurgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pediatric Neurosurgery.
About Pediatric Neurosurgery
The 3.3k papers published in Pediatric Neurosurgery in the last decades have received a total of 63.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Pediatric Neurosurgery usually cover Neurology (1.1k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k papers) and Genetics (583 papers) specifically the topics of Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1.0k papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (661 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (554 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (525 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (390 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (378 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (256 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (224 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pediatric Neurosurgery are David G. McLone, Arnold H. Menezes, Harold J. Hoffman, Harold L. Rekate, Joseph H. Piatt, Fred J. Epstein, James M. Drake, Paul Steinbok, Anthony J. Raimondi and Robin P. Humphreys.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.