James Hennesey

433 citations
17 papers · 178 indexed · h-index 4

James Hennesey

9 papers receiving 104 citations

Peers

James Hennesey
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • History 70
  • Political Science and International Relations 86
  • Religious studies 18
  • Geography, Planning and Development 14
  • Sociology and Political Science 91
Replace John T. McGreevy with:
John T. McGreevy United States
Henry Warner Bowden United States
Ernest R. Sandeen United States
James F. Findlay United States
Susan Juster United States
Tracy Fessenden United States
D. G. Hart United States
Phyllis Mack Netherlands
Émile Poulat France
Alexander Murray United Kingdom
James Hennesey relative to John T. McGreevy United States John T. McGreevy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John T. McGreevy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Hennesey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Hennesey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hennesey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hennesey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Hennesey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hennesey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hennesey. The network helps show where James Hennesey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside James Hennesey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Hennesey Line = papers co-authored together James Hennesey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
American history and the theological enterprise
20120
2 199769
3 19953
4 19950
5 19910
6 19873
7 198512
8 19841
9 19830
10 198262
11 198219
12 19781
13 19781
14 19781
15 19751
16 19643
17 19562

About James Hennesey

James Hennesey is a scholar working on History, Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 17 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (9 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (7 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper), Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (1 paper) and Race, History, and American Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (70 citations), Political Science and International Relations (86 citations), Religious studies (18 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (14 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (91 citations). James Hennesey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Orsi, Robert D. Cross, Patrick H. McNamara, Robert M. Grant, Martin E. Marty, Winthrop S. Hudson, Daniel L. Pals, James H. Nichols, Robert T. Handy and Jaroslav Pelikán. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Theological Studies, The American Historical Review, History of Education Quarterly and The Journal of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026