Daniel L. Kelly

1.2k citations
13 papers · 257 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers)Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers)
Partner nations
IrelandPortugalCanada

In The Last Decade

Daniel L. Kelly

13 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Daniel L. Kelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Plant Science 104
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 89
  • Ecology 78
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 59
  • Global and Planetary Change 59
Replace Noboru KURAMOTO with:
Noboru KURAMOTO Japan
Michael Jeschke Germany
Edwin R. Squiers United States
Julien Pétillon France
Ronald D. Hiebert United States
Roger J. Dungan New Zealand
Sarah L. Facey Australia
Órla McLaughlin France
Wyman C. Schmidt United States
Jana Doudová Czechia
Daniel L. Kelly relative to Noboru KURAMOTO Japan Noboru KURAMOTO's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Noboru KURAMOTO · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Kelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Kelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Kelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Kelly. The network helps show where Daniel L. Kelly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel L. Kelly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel L. Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel L. Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel L. Kelly. Daniel L. Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2
Monitoring Guidelines for the Assessment of Petrifying Springs in Ireland
5
3 3
4 28
5 57
6 4
7 38
8
Species status, hybridisation and geographic distribution of Irish populations of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L.
5
9 26
10 35
11
Cornus sericea L. in Ireland: an incipient weed of wetlands
4
12 11
13 36

About Daniel L. Kelly

Daniel L. Kelly is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (89 citations), Insect Science (51 citations) and Ecology (78 citations). Daniel L. Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Portugal and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Susan Iremonger, Colin T. Kelleher, Trevor R. Hodkinson, G. C. Douglas, Fraser Mitchell, Helena Freitas, George F. Smith, Erika Buscardo, Susanne Barth and Connor Douglas. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Biological Conservation and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026