George F. Smith

1.9k total citations
72 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

George F. Smith is a scholar working on Genetics, Global and Planetary Change and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, George F. Smith has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Genetics, 12 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 11 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in George F. Smith's work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers). George F. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers). George F. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. George F. Smith's co-authors include L. S. PENROSE, M. A. C. Ridler, N. S. Nicholas, Peter T. Ohara, Susan Iremonger, Fraser Mitchell, Tom Gittings, Anne Oxbrough, John O’Halloran and Paul S. Giller and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Lancet and JAMA.

In The Last Decade

George F. Smith

67 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

George F. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Genetics 329
  • Global and Planetary Change 260
  • Molecular Biology 257
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 228
  • Insect Science 205
Replace Willem Proesmans with:
Willem Proesmans Belgium
Irma Saloniemi Finland
R. G. Harrison United Kingdom
Mieke Jansen Belgium
Richard J. Goss United States
R.L. Buschbom United States
Sheri L. Johnson New Zealand
Karl Reiter Germany
Christopher B. Daniels Australia
Anna J. MacDonald United Kingdom
Willem Proesmans Belgium View profile →
Citations per field, relative to George F. Smith
George F. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to George F. Smith
George F. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by George F. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George F. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George F. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George F. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George F. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George F. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George F. Smith. The network helps show where George F. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George F. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George F. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George F. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George F. Smith. George F. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 0
3 43
4
Post-disturbance spruce-fir forest stand dynamics at seven disjunct sites
11
5
National Weather Service Interactive River Forecasting Using State, Parameter, and Data Modifications
3
6 39
7 38
8 1
9 26
10 5
11 13
12 20
13 2
14 20
15 2
16 7
17 22
18 23
19 26
20 21

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026