Countries citing papers authored by Wyman C. Schmidt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wyman C. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wyman C. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wyman C. Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wyman C. Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wyman C. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wyman C. Schmidt. The network helps show where Wyman C. Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wyman C. Schmidt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wyman C. Schmidt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wyman C. Schmidt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wyman C. Schmidt. Wyman C. Schmidt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schmidt, Wyman C., et al.. (2017). Stand Structure and Successional Status of Two Spruce-Fir Forests in Southern Utah. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).
2.
Schmidt, Wyman C.. (2012). How natural are strict forest reserves? Neophytes and therophytes as geobotanical indicators.. 83(2). 93–108.2 indexed citations
3.
Fischer, Christoph, et al.. (2009). Vegetation dynamics in beech-dominated strict forest reserves. A comparison study from southern Lower-Saxony (Germany).. 42(1). 45–68.2 indexed citations
4.
Schmidt, Wyman C.. (2000). Oak, hornbeam or beech? Vegetation and tree species composition of waterlogged and groundwater soils in the lowlands of northwestern Germany. Results from the forest nature reserves Hasbruch and Pretzetzer Landwehr.. Tuexenia. 20(20). 21–43.4 indexed citations
5.
Schmidt, Wyman C.. (1998). Stand density in relation to biological functions in young western larch forests. 101–111.2 indexed citations
Schmidt, Wyman C., et al.. (1996). Experimental forests, ranges, and watersheds in the northern Rocky Mountains: A compendium of outdoor laboratories in Utah, Idaho, and Montana. Forest Service general technical report. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
LePage, Ben A., et al.. (1995). The evolutionary history of the genus Larix (Pinaceae).. 19–29.29 indexed citations
10.
Schmidt, Wyman C., et al.. (1995). Ecology and management of larix forests.1 indexed citations
11.
Schmidt, Wyman C. & Friedrich‐Karl Holtmeier. (1994). Proceedings - International workshop on subalpine stone pines and their environment: the status of our knowledge. St. Moritz, Switzerland, September 5-11, 1992.. 309. 321.2 indexed citations
Schmidt, Wyman C., et al.. (1983). Effect of Fertilization on Western Spruce Budworm Feeding in Young Western Larch Stands. 85. 87–95.2 indexed citations
14.
Schmidt, Wyman C., et al.. (1980). Losses from an ecosystem during a brush fire in tropical savannah, Lamto, Ivory Coast.. 17(1). 7–12.4 indexed citations
15.
Schmidt, Wyman C.. (1980). EFFECTS OF STAND DENSITY AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS ON DEVELOPMENT OF YOUNG LARIX OCCIDENTALIS NUTT. The Mathematics Enthusiast.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.