Daniel J. Brown

107 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel J. Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 481
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 305
  • Social Psychology 443
  • Spectroscopy 278
  • Applied Psychology 84
Replace George Graham with:
George Graham United States
Jane Lee United States
Christopher L. Stevenson United States
Robert Kane United States
Wayne Smith New Zealand
Trevor Wright United Kingdom
Louise Kamuk Storm Denmark
D. Liljequist Sweden
J. Baranowski Poland
David M. Hansen United States
Daniel J. Brown relative to George Graham United States George Graham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.0×
George Graham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Brown. The network helps show where Daniel J. Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Brown Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016155
2 2017118
3 2017105
4 2014104
5 201599
6 199476
7 201749
8 199431
9 199831
10 201830
11 201729
12 199825
13 201925
14 199924
15 199523
16 199821
17 202120
18 202019
19 202119
20 200019

About Daniel J. Brown

Daniel J. Brown is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 119 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Design and Applications (50 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (27 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (21 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (17 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (16 papers), Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (16 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (14 papers) and Laser Material Processing Techniques (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (481 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (305 citations), Social Psychology (443 citations), Spectroscopy (278 citations) and Applied Psychology (84 citations). Daniel J. Brown has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Fletcher, James A. Piper, Michael J. Withford, Rachel Arnold, Robert J. Carman, Martyn Standage, Mustafa Sarkar, David W. Coutts, Richard P. Mildren and Ian Henry. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Optics Communications, Optics Letters, Psychology of sport and exercise and IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact