Daniel H. Calhoun

24 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Daniel H. Calhoun
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • General Psychology 15
  • Public Administration 29
  • History and Philosophy of Science 32
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Marketing 46
Replace Burton J. Bledstein with:
Burton J. Bledstein United States
Frederick Rudolph United States
Sidney Fine United States
William Graebner United States
Jürgen Herbst United States
John R. Thelin United States
Marvin Lazerson United States
William J. Reese United States
Charles M. Grigg United States
David R. Shumway United States
Daniel H. Calhoun relative to Burton J. Bledstein United States Burton J. Bledstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Burton J. Bledstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel H. Calhoun

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel H. Calhoun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel H. Calhoun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel H. Calhoun more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel H. Calhoun

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel H. Calhoun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel H. Calhoun. The network helps show where Daniel H. Calhoun may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Daniel H. Calhoun, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel H. Calhoun Line = papers co-authored together Daniel H. Calhoun links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971236
2 1976159
3 198446
4 197636
5
The Intelligence of a People
197331
6 197521
7 196120
8 196517
9 199014
10 197913
11 196011
12 197610
13 19617
14
The educating of Americans : a documentary history
19696
15 19844
16 19673
17 19672
18 19792
19 20251
20 19661

About Daniel H. Calhoun

Daniel H. Calhoun is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Education and Marketing, having authored 28 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), Historical Education Studies Worldwide (2 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (15 citations), Public Administration (29 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (32 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations) and Marketing (46 citations). Daniel H. Calhoun has collaborated with scholars based in United States and San Marino. Frequent co-authors include Wilbert E. Moore, Mary O. Furner, Gerald L. Geison, Paul H. Mattingly, Bruce Sinclair, William R. Johnson, John G. Blair, Sara Ruth Watson, Howard B. Roback and Carl R. Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Technology and Culture, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and History of Education Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact