Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change.
Countries citing papers authored by Carl R. Rogers
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Carl R. Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl R. Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl R. Rogers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl R. Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl R. Rogers. The network helps show where Carl R. Rogers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carl R. Rogers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carl R. Rogers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carl R. Rogers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Carl R. Rogers. Carl R. Rogers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rogers, Carl R. & Jürgen Kriz. (2016). Eine Theorie der Psychotherapie, der Persönlichkeit und der zwischenmenschlichen Beziehungen.7 indexed citations
2.
Rogers, Carl R.. (2012). Die klientenzentrierte Gesprächspsychotherapie. Fischer eBooks.8 indexed citations
3.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1987). Grupos de encuentro. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 47(2). 166–70.7 indexed citations
Rogers, Carl R.. (1986). Libertad y creatividad en la educación en la década de los ochenta. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 19(5). 439–48.6 indexed citations
7.
Rogers, Carl R., et al.. (1986). Liberté pour apprendre. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).23 indexed citations
8.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1983). Therapeut und Klient.16 indexed citations
9.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1977). Beyond the Watershed: And Where Now?.. Educational leadership.4 indexed citations
10.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1974). Lernen in Freiheit : Zur Bildungsreform in Schule und Universität.10 indexed citations
11.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1972). Die nicht-direktive Beratung.32 indexed citations
12.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1972). Can Schools Grow Persons. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review. 37(8). 20–21.4 indexed citations
Rogers, Carl R., et al.. (1967). Le développement de la personne. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 21(4).59 indexed citations
15.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1962). The interpersonal relationship: The core of guidance.. Harvard Educational Review.220 indexed citations
16.
Rogers, Carl R., et al.. (1962). Psychothérapie et relations humaines : théorie et pratique de la thérapie non-directive.7 indexed citations
17.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1961). Personal adjustment inventory : series of character and personality tests.1 indexed citations
18.
Rogers, Carl R.. (1961). Entwicklung der Persönlichkeit : Psychotherapie aus der Sicht eines Therapeuten. Klett-Cotta eBooks.4 indexed citations
Rogers, Carl R., et al.. (1952). Barriers and gateways to communication.. Harvard business review.76 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.