Daniel Finnegan

482 total citations
29 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Daniel Finnegan is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Public Administration and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Finnegan has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 8 papers in Public Administration and 6 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Daniel Finnegan's work include Social Work Education and Practice (8 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers). Daniel Finnegan is often cited by papers focused on Social Work Education and Practice (8 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers). Daniel Finnegan collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Daniel Finnegan's co-authors include Eamonn O’Neill, Michael J. Proulx, André Ivanoff, Loring P. Jones, Melinda Hohman, Jude Buckley, Christof Lutteroth, Burkhard Wüensche, Peter W. Dowrick and James Bilzon and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Experimental Brain Research and Research on Social Work Practice.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Finnegan

25 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Finnegan United Kingdom 9 105 55 50 50 46 29 285
Gunn Astrid Baugerud Norway 13 35 0.3× 40 0.7× 91 1.8× 24 0.5× 54 1.2× 35 360
Chiao Ling Huang Taiwan 9 84 0.8× 41 0.7× 82 1.6× 73 1.5× 31 0.7× 17 307
Ayelet Gal‐Oz Israel 8 159 1.5× 144 2.6× 44 0.9× 46 0.9× 50 1.1× 12 384
Naska Goagoses Germany 11 58 0.6× 26 0.5× 56 1.1× 93 1.9× 15 0.3× 46 283
Rachel Menzies United Kingdom 10 88 0.8× 41 0.7× 35 0.7× 112 2.2× 14 0.3× 20 349
Robin S. Rosenberg United States 6 131 1.2× 37 0.7× 139 2.8× 21 0.4× 15 0.3× 10 371
Gail Kenning Australia 14 172 1.6× 14 0.3× 61 1.2× 6 0.1× 86 1.9× 42 497
Melissa B. Gutworth United States 7 112 1.1× 50 0.9× 152 3.0× 30 0.6× 9 0.2× 14 403
Ilja Cornelisz Netherlands 14 69 0.7× 69 1.3× 97 1.9× 148 3.0× 25 0.5× 41 527
Dany Lussier‐Desrochers Canada 8 36 0.3× 24 0.4× 24 0.5× 32 0.6× 13 0.3× 26 277

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Finnegan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Finnegan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Finnegan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Finnegan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Finnegan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Finnegan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Finnegan. The network helps show where Daniel Finnegan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Finnegan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Finnegan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Finnegan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Finnegan. Daniel Finnegan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (2024). Advantages of Friend-Modelled Social Interactive Feedforward for VR Exergaming. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 8(CHI PLAY). 1–19.
2.
Sousa, Alexandra A. de, et al.. (2024). Potential factors contributing to observed sex differences in virtual-reality-induced sickness. Experimental Brain Research. 242(2). 463–475. 4 indexed citations
3.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (2024). Standardizing Video-Based Avionics and Mission Systems around the ARINC 818-3 Video Bus. 1–9. 1 indexed citations
4.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (2024). A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the use and effectiveness of extended reality technology in the assessment, treatment and study of obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. 42. 100893–100893. 2 indexed citations
5.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (2022). A Virtual Reality Application of the Rubber Hand Illusion Induced by Ultrasonic Mid-air Haptic Stimulation. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception. 19(1). 1–19. 8 indexed citations
6.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (2021). Does Mixed Reality Have a Cassandra Complex?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 3 indexed citations
7.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Immersive virtual environments and embodied agents for e-learning applications. PeerJ Computer Science. 6. e315–e315. 17 indexed citations
8.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Agonistic Games. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 103–108. 7 indexed citations
9.
Finnegan, Daniel, Jude Buckley, Peter W. Dowrick, et al.. (2018). Interactive Feedforward for Improving Performance and Maintaining Intrinsic Motivation in VR Exergaming. Pure (University of Bath). 1–14. 71 indexed citations
10.
Finnegan, Daniel, Eamonn O’Neill, & Michael J. Proulx. (2017). An approach to reducing distance compression in audiovisual virtual environments. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 1–6. 5 indexed citations
11.
Finnegan, Daniel, Eamonn O’Neill, & Michael J. Proulx. (2016). Compensating for Distance Compression in Audiovisual Virtual Environments Using Incongruence. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 200–212. 34 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Lisa, Melinda Hohman, Sally Mathiesen, & Daniel Finnegan. (2014). Furloughs and Faculty Management of Time: Maintaining Quality in an Economic Crisis. Journal of Social Work Education. 50(2). 334–348. 7 indexed citations
13.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (2014). Reindeer & wolves. University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark). 411–412. 7 indexed citations
14.
Hohman, Melinda, et al.. (2010). Predictors of Role Legitimacy and Role Adequacy of Social Workers Working with Substance-Using Clients. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
15.
Hohman, Melinda & Daniel Finnegan. (2006). A Computer-Assisted Self-Interview (CASI) Assignment in the MSW Classroom. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 24(2-3). 135–147. 4 indexed citations
16.
Jones, Lisa, et al.. (2001). Using TANF Sanctions to Increase High School Graduation. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare. 28(3). 5 indexed citations
17.
Finnegan, Daniel, et al.. (1997). Collaboration. Administration in Social Work. 21(3-4). 83–107. 18 indexed citations
18.
Finnegan, Daniel. (1996). Unraveling Social Workers' Ambivalence Toward Computer Technology. Computers in Human Services. 13(2). 33–49. 10 indexed citations
19.
Finnegan, Daniel, André Ivanoff, & Nancy J. Smyth. (1991). The Computer Applications Explosion. Computers in Human Services. 8(2). 1–19. 5 indexed citations
20.
Finnegan, Daniel & André Ivanoff. (1991). Effects of Brief Computer Training on Attitudes toward Computer Use in Practice: An Educational Experiment. Journal of Social Work Education. 27(1). 73–82. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026