Carlota Batres
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Marketing top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- David I. PerrettRichard RussellMartha Lucia Borras-GuevaraAurélie PorcheronDaniel E. ReFrédérique MorizotVictor Kenji Medeiros ShiramizuGwenaël Kaminski
- Topics
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (25 papers)Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (11 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEScientific ReportsCognition
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Carlota Batres
30 papers receiving 364 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 260
- Cognitive Neuroscience 118
- Clinical Psychology 108
- Marketing 98
- Sociology and Political Science 95
Countries citing papers authored by Carlota Batres
This map shows the geographic impact of Carlota Batres's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carlota Batres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carlota Batres more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carlota Batres
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carlota Batres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carlota Batres. The network helps show where Carlota Batres may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carlota Batres
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carlota Batres. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carlota Batres based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carlota Batres. Carlota Batres is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 43 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 36 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Carlota Batres
Carlota Batres is a scholar working on Museology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Marketing, having authored 33 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (25 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (11 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (260 citations), Museology (50 citations) and Marketing (98 citations). Carlota Batres has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David I. Perrett, Richard Russell, Martha Lucia Borras-Guevara, Aurélie Porcheron, Daniel E. Re, Frédérique Morizot, Victor Kenji Medeiros Shiramizu, Gwenaël Kaminski, Lee Cronk and Jeffry A. Simpson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.