Daniel E. Bradford

2.1k citations
33 papers · 874 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Bradford

30 papers receiving 841 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Bradford
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 255
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 410
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 443
  • Biological Psychiatry 32
  • Applied Psychology 58
Replace Alisa Powers with:
Alisa Powers United States
Iris Lange Netherlands
Marieke Bos Netherlands
Marieke Effting Netherlands
Kristen L. Mackiewicz United States
Anna Gerlicher Netherlands
Jan Richter Germany
Diana Armbruster Germany
Lydia Kogler Germany
Kazufumi Omura Japan
Daniel E. Bradford relative to Alisa Powers United States Alisa Powers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alisa Powers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Bradford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Bradford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Bradford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Bradford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Bradford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Bradford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Bradford. The network helps show where Daniel E. Bradford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Bradford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Bradford Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Bradford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008197
2 2013187
3 201372
4 201564
5 201648
6 201534
7 202231
8 201429
9 201426
10 201725
11 202220
12 201819
13 201719
14 201717
15 202116
16 201514
17 196713
18 20147
19 19846
20 20236

About Daniel E. Bradford

Daniel E. Bradford is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (255 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (410 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (443 citations), Biological Psychiatry (32 citations) and Applied Psychology (58 citations). Daniel E. Bradford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include John J. Curtin, Shmuel Lissek, Christian Grillon, Jesse T. Kaye, Tori Espensen-Sturges, Richard C. Reynolds, Philip Burton, Ruben P. Alvarez, Stephanie J. Rabin and Daniel S. Pine. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, Clinical Psychological Science, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Journal of Visualized Experiments and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact