Alisa Powers

1.8k citations
7 papers · 911 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Alisa Powers

7 papers receiving 902 citations

Peers

Alisa Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 214
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 443
  • General Decision Sciences 41
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 275
  • Clinical Psychology 384
Replace Kyle G. Ratner with:
Kyle G. Ratner United States
Kazufumi Omura Japan
Marieke Bos Netherlands
Anja S. Euser Netherlands
Sandra Jazbec United States
Allison L. Jahn United States
Estíbaliz Arce United States
Kristen L. Mackiewicz United States
Jennifer N. Bress United States
Jamil P. Bhanji United States
Alisa Powers relative to Kyle G. Ratner United States Kyle G. Ratner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Kyle G. Ratner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alisa Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alisa Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alisa Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alisa Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alisa Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alisa Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alisa Powers. The network helps show where Alisa Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alisa Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alisa Powers Line = papers co-authored together Alisa Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2012312
2 2016177
3 2015107
4 2015100
5 201491
6 201663
7 201461

About Alisa Powers

Alisa Powers is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (214 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (443 citations), General Decision Sciences (41 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (275 citations) and Clinical Psychology (384 citations). Alisa Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. Frequent co-authors include B.J. Casey, Erika J. Ruberry, Natasha Mehta, Jochen Weber, Walter Mischel, Jennifer A. Silvers, Catherine Insel, Peter Franz, Kevin N. Ochsner and Chelsea Helion. Their work appears in journals such as Cerebral Cortex, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact