Ema Tanovic

599 total citations
9 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

Ema Tanovic is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ema Tanovic has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ema Tanovic's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). Ema Tanovic is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). Ema Tanovic collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Ema Tanovic's co-authors include Jutta Joormann, Dylan G. Gee, Charles A. Sanislow, Greg Hajcak, Luise Pruessner, Michael P. Berry, Daniel E. Bradford, Jayne Morriss, Shannon Wake and Jesse T. Kaye and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Psychophysiology and Emotion.

In The Last Decade

Ema Tanovic

9 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ema Tanovic United States	8	219	161	101	47	38	9	353
Felicia Jackson United States	14	264 1.2×	308 1.9×	136 1.3×	68 1.4×	49 1.3×	19	512
Paul B. Sharp United States	8	154 0.7×	132 0.8×	91 0.9×	40 0.9×	41 1.1×	20	274
Iulia Banica Canada	9	152 0.7×	166 1.0×	107 1.1×	19 0.4×	40 1.1×	17	275
Kimberley J. Levitt Canada	8	275 1.3×	95 0.6×	116 1.1×	80 1.7×	46 1.2×	11	377
Alexandra Cowden Hindash United States	9	195 0.9×	81 0.5×	139 1.4×	12 0.3×	31 0.8×	12	273
Kim Taylor‐Thompson United States	6	62 0.3×	117 0.7×	112 1.1×	26 0.6×	51 1.3×	15	279
Christine A. Moberg United States	7	173 0.8×	63 0.4×	77 0.8×	20 0.4×	36 0.9×	7	323
Luise Pruessner Germany	8	152 0.7×	58 0.4×	187 1.9×	30 0.6×	62 1.6×	27	302
Jesolyn Lucas United States	7	134 0.6×	136 0.8×	119 1.2×	51 1.1×	20 0.5×	7	391
Lourdes Espinosa Fernández Spain	11	147 0.7×	126 0.8×	138 1.4×	20 0.4×	83 2.2×	32	339

Countries citing papers authored by Ema Tanovic

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ema Tanovic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ema Tanovic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ema Tanovic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ema Tanovic

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ema Tanovic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ema Tanovic. The network helps show where Ema Tanovic may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ema Tanovic

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ema Tanovic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ema Tanovic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ema Tanovic. Ema Tanovic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Morriss, Jayne, Daniel E. Bradford, Shannon Wake, et al.. (2021). Intolerance of uncertainty and physiological responses during instructed uncertain threat: A multi-lab investigation. Biological Psychology. 167. 108223–108223. 16 indexed citations

Rutherford, Ashleigh, Ema Tanovic, Daniel E. Bradford, & Jutta Joormann. (2020). Psychophysiological correlates of anxious apprehension: Trait worry is associated with startle response to threat. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 158. 136–142. 5 indexed citations

Tanovic, Ema & Jutta Joormann. (2019). Anticipating the unknown: The stimulus-preceding negativity is enhanced by uncertain threat. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 139. 68–73. 10 indexed citations

Berry, Michael P., Ema Tanovic, Jutta Joormann, & Charles A. Sanislow. (2019). Relation of depression symptoms to sustained reward and loss sensitivity. Psychophysiology. 56(7). e13364–e13364. 21 indexed citations

Tanovic, Ema, Luise Pruessner, & Jutta Joormann. (2018). Attention and anticipation in response to varying levels of uncertain threat: An ERP study. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 18(6). 1207–1220. 27 indexed citations

Tanovic, Ema, Dylan G. Gee, & Jutta Joormann. (2018). Intolerance of uncertainty: Neural and psychophysiological correlates of the perception of uncertainty as threatening. Clinical Psychology Review. 60. 87–99. 141 indexed citations

Tanovic, Ema, Greg Hajcak, & Jutta Joormann. (2018). Hating waiting. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 9(1). 13 indexed citations

Tanovic, Ema, Greg Hajcak, & Charles A. Sanislow. (2017). Rumination is associated with diminished performance monitoring.. Emotion. 17(6). 953–964. 23 indexed citations

Joormann, Jutta & Ema Tanovic. (2015). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: examining cognitive control and emotion regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology. 4. 86–92. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact