Ema Tanovic

599 citations
9 papers · 353 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ema Tanovic

9 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers

Ema Tanovic
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 219
  • General Decision Sciences 16
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 161
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 20
Replace Felicia Jackson with:
Felicia Jackson United States
Paul B. Sharp United States
Iulia Banica Canada
Kim Taylor‐Thompson United States
Kimberley J. Levitt Canada
Lee Hogan United Kingdom
Christine A. Moberg United States
Jordan A. Tharp United States
Hannah I. Volpert‐Esmond United States
Edith M. Rickett United States
Ema Tanovic relative to Felicia Jackson United States Felicia Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Felicia Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ema Tanovic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ema Tanovic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ema Tanovic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ema Tanovic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ema Tanovic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ema Tanovic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ema Tanovic. The network helps show where Ema Tanovic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Ema Tanovic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ema Tanovic Line = papers co-authored together Ema Tanovic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2018141
2 201597
3 201827
4 201723
5 201921
6 202116
7 201813
8 201910
9 20205

About Ema Tanovic

Ema Tanovic is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (219 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (20 citations). Ema Tanovic has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jutta Joormann, Dylan G. Gee, Charles A. Sanislow, Greg Hajcak, Luise Pruessner, Michael P. Berry, Daniel E. Bradford, Jayne Morriss, Shannon Wake and Jesse T. Kaye. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Psychophysiology, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology Review, Emotion and Biological Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact