Daniel C. Smith

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Daniel C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 164
  • Surgery 752
  • Gastroenterology 88
  • Pharmacy 61
  • Emergency Medicine 91
Replace Jonathan A. Myers with:
Jonathan A. Myers United States
Anthony M.‐H. Ho Canada
John M. Porter United States
Farid M. Shamji Canada
Cornelis JHM van Laarhoven Netherlands
D. A. Rocke South Africa
Vladimir Kushnir United States
Loren D. Nelson United States
William H. Hall United States
Monika Nothacker Germany
Daniel C. Smith relative to Jonathan A. Myers United States Jonathan A. Myers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Jonathan A. Myers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006180
2 1997179
3 2008124
4 1993114
5 200386
6 201077
7 200358
8 200048
9 201845
10 201344
11 200443
12 201540
13 201238
14 199338
15
How to Kill a Team's Creativity
200234
16 201429
17 201329
18 200428
19 200525
20 201021

About Daniel C. Smith

Daniel C. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (5 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers) and Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (164 citations), Surgery (752 citations), Gastroenterology (88 citations), Pharmacy (61 citations) and Emergency Medicine (91 citations). Daniel C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael G. Sarr, Mercedeh Baghai, Anthony G. Gallagher, Keith A. Kelly, K.E. Behrns, Michel M. Murr, Michael L. Kendrick, Raúl J. Rosenthal, Samuel Szomstein and Rodrigo González. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Journal of Emergency Medicine, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Geophysical Research Letters and Annals of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact