The Journal of Arthroplasty

12.3k papers and 343.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 12.3k papers published in The Journal of Arthroplasty in the last decades have received a total of 343.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Arthroplasty usually cover Surgery (11.5k papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (579 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (554 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (9.2k papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (9.1k papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (6.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Arthroplasty are Javad Parvizi, Craig J. Della Valle, Charles A. Engh, Merrill A. Ritter, Kevin J. Bozic, Steven M. Kurtz, Daniel J. Berry, Edmund Lau, Wayne G. Paprosky and William H. Harris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Arthroplasty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Arthroplasty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Arthroplasty.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Arthroplasty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Arthroplasty. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Arthroplasty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Arthroplasty more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025