John M. Porter
- Surgery top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Internal Medicine top 1%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Th. RiviniusRao R. IvaturyGregory L. MonetaRonald SimónLawrence N. DiebelLloyd M. TaylorG. Patrick ClagettN L Browse
- Topics
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (12 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (12 papers)Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
John M. Porter
55 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Surgery 1.1k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 660
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 562
- Internal Medicine 499
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 194
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Porter. The network helps show where John M. Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Porter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Porter. John M. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 58 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | Broad band infrared spectroscopy of massive young stellar objects | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 247 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 85 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Fifteen-year results of ambulatory compression therapy for chronic venous ulcers. | 198 |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | Comparison of heparin and streptokinase in the treatment of venous thrombosis. | 77 |
About John M. Porter
John M. Porter is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Instrumentation and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (12 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (12 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (499 citations), Instrumentation (120 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (562 citations). John M. Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Th. Rivinius, Rao R. Ivatury, Gregory L. Moneta, Ronald Simón, Lawrence N. Diebel, Lloyd M. Taylor, G. Patrick Clagett, N L Browse, R. Eugene Zierler and Andrew Nicolaides. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Astrophysical Journal and Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.