Matthew R. Broome
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.5%
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Co-authors
- Philip McGuireLouise JohnsSteven WilliamsLucia ValmaggiaPaolo Fusar‐PoliElvira BramonP. TabrahamSteven Marwaha
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (80 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (70 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (39 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNano Letters
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Matthew R. Broome
195 papers receiving 8.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
- Psychiatry and Mental health 4.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.7k
- Clinical Psychology 1.6k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.5k
- Philosophy 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew R. Broome
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew R. Broome's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew R. Broome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew R. Broome more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew R. Broome
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew R. Broome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew R. Broome. The network helps show where Matthew R. Broome may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew R. Broome
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew R. Broome. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew R. Broome based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew R. Broome. Matthew R. Broome is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | MOOD INSTABILITY AND PSYCHOSIS: ANALYSES OF BRITISH NATIONAL SURVEY DATA | 1 |
| 17 | A Bad Case of the Flu? The Comparative Phenomenology of Depression and Somatic Illness | 15 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | If You Did Not Care, You Would Not Notice: Recognition and Estrangement in Psychopathology | 4 |
| 20 | Scientific psychiatry? [6] (multiple letters) | 1 |
About Matthew R. Broome
Matthew R. Broome is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 208 papers that have together received 8.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (80 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (70 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (39 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (4.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.7k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (401 citations). Matthew R. Broome has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip McGuire, Louise Johns, Steven Williams, Lucia Valmaggia, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Elvira Bramon, P. Tabraham, Steven Marwaha, Oliver Howes and Isabel Valli. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.