Hilary Glow
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Music top 5%
- Co-authors
- Katya JohansonJennifer RadbourneStella MinahanAbigail GilmorePeter GahanMatthew ReasonAmanda SmithMark Taylor
- Topics
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development (27 papers)Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (15 papers)Social and Cultural Dynamics (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Hilary Glow
40 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Sociology and Political Science 175
- Urban Studies 155
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 62
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
- Music 38
Countries citing papers authored by Hilary Glow
This map shows the geographic impact of Hilary Glow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hilary Glow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hilary Glow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hilary Glow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hilary Glow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hilary Glow. The network helps show where Hilary Glow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hilary Glow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hilary Glow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hilary Glow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hilary Glow. Hilary Glow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Gaming the Data: The Evaluation of Arts Activities and the Tensions for Public Policy | 1 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | A virtuous circle: the positive evaluation phenomenon in arts audience research | 16 |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 'It's not enough for the work of art to be great' : children and young people as museum visitors | 9 |
| 10 | Hidden stories : listening to the audience at the live performance | 5 |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Australian indigenous performing arts and cultural policy | 0 |
| 18 | Re-thinking multiculturalism: performing the Cronulla beach riot | 3 |
| 19 | Cultural policy in crisis? An Australian case study | 3 |
| 20 | Women's Theatre and the APG | 1 |
About Hilary Glow
Hilary Glow is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Museology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (27 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (15 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (155 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (62 citations) and Music (38 citations). Hilary Glow has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Katya Johanson, Jennifer Radbourne, Stella Minahan, Abigail Gilmore, Peter Gahan, Matthew Reason, Amanda Smith, Mark Taylor, Amanda Pyman and Andrew Noblet. Their work appears in journals such as Work Employment and Society, Poetics and Journal of sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.