Dane Thomas
Impact in
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Seedling growth and survival studies
- Forestry top 5%
- Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Papers in
-
- Forest ecology and management 8
- Seedling growth and survival studies 3
-
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 6
- Co-authors
- D. W. TurnerAdrienne B. NicotraR. Geoff B. SmithJürgen BauhusDerek EamusMichael HensonMervyn ShepherdRobert J Henry
In The Last Decade
Dane Thomas
19 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 197
- Forestry 46
- Horticulture 7
- Global and Planetary Change 126
- Plant Science 218
Countries citing papers authored by Dane Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Dane Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dane Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dane Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dane Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dane Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dane Thomas. The network helps show where Dane Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dane Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 9 | Conservation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in 44 wood quality candidate genes of Eucalyptus globulus, Eucalyptus pyrocarpa and Eucalyptus pilularis | 2010 | 1 |
| 10 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 13 | Genetic variation in shrinkaGe properties of Eucalyptus pilularis assessed usinG increment cores and test blocks | 2008 | 11 |
| 14 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 42 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 110 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 64 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 38 |
About Dane Thomas
Dane Thomas is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Forestry and Cell Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (8 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (3 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (3 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (3 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (197 citations), Forestry (46 citations), Horticulture (7 citations), Global and Planetary Change (126 citations) and Plant Science (218 citations). Dane Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D. W. Turner, Adrienne B. Nicotra, R. Geoff B. Smith, Jürgen Bauhus, Derek Eamus, Michael Henson, Mervyn Shepherd, Robert J Henry, Patrick Pyttel and David I. Forrester. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Forestry, Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Forests and Australian Journal of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.