K. Pinyopusarerk

795 total citations
47 papers, 583 citations indexed

About

K. Pinyopusarerk is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Pinyopusarerk has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 583 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Plant Science, 11 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in K. Pinyopusarerk's work include Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers) and African Botany and Ecology Studies (6 papers). K. Pinyopusarerk is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers) and African Botany and Ecology Studies (6 papers). K. Pinyopusarerk collaborates with scholars based in Australia, China and France. K. Pinyopusarerk's co-authors include David Bush, E. R. Williams, J. C. Doran, John Turnbull, Trevor H. Booth, Chonglu Zhong, D. J. Boland, Zhen Chen, Claudine Franche and Didier Bogusz and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Biomass and Bioenergy and Land Use Policy.

In The Last Decade

K. Pinyopusarerk

46 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
K. Pinyopusarerk Australia	14	316	177	121	100	84	47	583
Lars Graudal Denmark	13	220 0.7×	120 0.7×	118 1.0×	116 1.2×	103 1.2×	41	644
B. P. M. Hyland Australia	10	230 0.7×	222 1.3×	120 1.0×	109 1.1×	221 2.6×	16	616
Emmanuel Opuni‐Frimpong Ghana	13	136 0.4×	165 0.9×	88 0.7×	126 1.3×	72 0.9×	32	452
D. A. Kleinig Australia	5	200 0.6×	237 1.3×	80 0.7×	124 1.2×	169 2.0×	9	557
William S. Dvorak United States	13	123 0.4×	150 0.8×	67 0.6×	69 0.7×	91 1.1×	24	473
Ananda Virgínia de Aguiar Brazil	11	151 0.5×	171 1.0×	44 0.4×	39 0.4×	57 0.7×	82	389
RD Johnston	8	233 0.7×	235 1.3×	68 0.6×	143 1.4×	130 1.5×	11	562
Daniel Ofori Ghana	13	211 0.7×	81 0.5×	142 1.2×	67 0.7×	109 1.3×	39	514
Emily Beech United Kingdom	5	99 0.3×	133 0.8×	72 0.6×	57 0.6×	132 1.6×	12	356
J. T. Talbert United States	5	306 1.0×	423 2.4×	121 1.0×	119 1.2×	69 0.8×	7	760

Countries citing papers authored by K. Pinyopusarerk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Pinyopusarerk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Pinyopusarerk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Pinyopusarerk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Pinyopusarerk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Pinyopusarerk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Pinyopusarerk. The network helps show where K. Pinyopusarerk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Pinyopusarerk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Pinyopusarerk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Pinyopusarerk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Pinyopusarerk. K. Pinyopusarerk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pinyopusarerk, K., et al.. (2022). Evaluation of four Melaleuca species for wood and non-wood production in Thailand. Agriculture and Natural Resources. 56(5). 1 indexed citations

Pinyopusarerk, K., et al.. (2017). Genetic parameter estimates for growth, stem-form and branching traits of Casuarina junghuhniana clones grown in Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management. 404. 251–257. 14 indexed citations

Chen, Zhong, et al.. (2016). Reproductive biology and breeding system in Casuarina equisetifolia (Casuarinaceae) – implication for genetic improvement. Australian Journal of Botany. 64(2). 120–128. 11 indexed citations

Duong, Thuc‐Huy, et al.. (2013). Storage behaviour of Jatropha curcas seeds.. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE. 25(2). 193–199. 7 indexed citations

Zhou, Zaizhi, et al.. (2012). Improved Tolerance of Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Seedlings to Low-Temperature Stress by the Combined Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Paclobutrazol. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 31(3). 427–435. 21 indexed citations

Shen, Junling, K. Pinyopusarerk, David Bush, & Xiaoyang Chen. (2011). AFLP-based molecular characterization of 63 populations of Jatropha curcas L. grown in provenance trials in China and Vietnam. Biomass and Bioenergy. 37. 265–274. 23 indexed citations

Zhong, Chongshan, et al.. (2010). Improving drought tolerance of Casuarina equisetifolia seedlings by arbuscular mycorrhizas under glasshouse conditions. New Forests. 40(3). 261–271. 48 indexed citations

Huang, Guohe, et al.. (2009). Genetic Variation and Structure of native and introduced Casuarina equisetifolia (L. Johnson) Provenances. Silvae genetica. 58(1-6). 79–85. 6 indexed citations

Pinyopusarerk, K., et al.. (2005). VARIATIONS IN GROWTH AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CASUARINA JUNGHUHNIANA PROVENANCES GROWN IN THAILAND. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE. 5 indexed citations

10.

Pinyopusarerk, K., et al.. (2004). Evaluation of International Provenance Trials of Casuarina equisetifolia. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 11 indexed citations

11.

Pinyopusarerk, K. & Antoine Kalinganiré. (2003). Domestication of Chukrasia. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 5 indexed citations

12.

Kalinganiré, Antoine, K. Pinyopusarerk, & Earle Williams. (2002). Geographic variation in seedling morphology of Chukrasia species. Australian Journal of Botany. 50(3). 319–330. 5 indexed citations

13.

Pinyopusarerk, K., et al.. (1996). Two-year performance of Acacia and Eucalyptus species in a provenance trial in Lao P.D.R.. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE. 8(3). 412–423. 7 indexed citations

14.

Pinyopusarerk, K., et al.. (1996). Planting and uses of Casuarina equisetifolia in Vietnam.. 223–225. 2 indexed citations

15.

Pinyopusarerk, K., et al.. (1996). Geographic variation in growth and morphological traits of Casuarina equisetifolia.. 143–151. 4 indexed citations

16.

Dudzinski, M. J., Jatin Sharma, C. Mohanan, et al.. (1996). The extent, recognition and management of Casuarina blister bark disease.. 3 indexed citations

17.

Pinyopusarerk, K. & Alan House. (1993). Casuarina : an annotated bibliography of C. equisetifolia, C. junghuhniana and C. oligodon. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 13 indexed citations

18.

Boland, D. J., K. Pinyopusarerk, M. W. McDonald, Tom Jovanovic, & Trevor H. Booth. (1990). The habitat of Acacia auriculiformis and probable factors associated with its distribution.. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE. 3(2). 159–180. 23 indexed citations

19.

Pinyopusarerk, K. & D. J. Boland. (1990). Casuarina junghuhniana: a highly adaptable tropical casuarina.. 1 indexed citations

20.

Pinyopusarerk, K., et al.. (1987). Acacia species and provenance trials in Thailand.. 143–146. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact