Dana Berkowitz
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 10
-
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 3
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 2
- Co-authors
- William MarsiglioLinda Liska BelgraveJustine TinklerCheryl NewtonRodney E. WilloughbyIvor BerkowitzAlice D. AckermanRobert A. Halberstein
- Journals
- Journal of GLBT Family Studies (4 papers)Journal of Family Theory & Review (2 papers)Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (2 papers)Social Currents (1 paper)Sex Roles (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Dana Berkowitz
24 papers receiving 637 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Reproductive Medicine 327
- Gender Studies 179
- Social Psychology 341
- Demography 187
- Safety Research 70
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Berkowitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Berkowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Berkowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Berkowitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Berkowitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Berkowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Berkowitz. The network helps show where Dana Berkowitz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Dana Berkowitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 53 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 56 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 166 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 19 | When It Takes (More Than) Two to Tango: Negotations of Connectedness in Lesbian and Gay Families | 2006 | 1 |
| 20 | Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care | 1996 | 85 |
About Dana Berkowitz
Dana Berkowitz is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Demography and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (12 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (327 citations), Gender Studies (179 citations), Social Psychology (341 citations), Demography (187 citations) and Safety Research (70 citations). Dana Berkowitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Marsiglio, Linda Liska Belgrave, Justine Tinkler, Cheryl Newton, Rodney E. Willoughby, Ivor Berkowitz, Alice D. Ackerman, Robert A. Halberstein, K. L. Broad and Emily S. Mann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of GLBT Family Studies, Journal of Family Theory & Review, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Social Currents and Sex Roles.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.