Dana A. Weiser
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Heidi R. RiggioDaniel J. WeigelDaniel N. JonesAmelia E. TalleyJessica L. MalischPumtiwitt C. McCarthyJaclyn E. Cañas‐CarrellNaïma Moustaïd‐Moussa
- Topics
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (14 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (11 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPersonality and Individual DifferencesHuman Communication Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesPanama
In The Last Decade
Dana A. Weiser
40 papers receiving 927 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Clinical Psychology 350
- Sociology and Political Science 331
- Social Psychology 314
- Gender Studies 223
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 223
Countries citing papers authored by Dana A. Weiser
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana A. Weiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana A. Weiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana A. Weiser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana A. Weiser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana A. Weiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana A. Weiser. The network helps show where Dana A. Weiser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana A. Weiser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana A. Weiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana A. Weiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana A. Weiser. Dana A. Weiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity. | 18 |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | Identifying Online Preferences and Needs of Early Childhood Professionals. | 15 |
| 20 | 80 |
About Dana A. Weiser
Dana A. Weiser is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (14 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (11 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (223 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (223 citations) and Clinical Psychology (350 citations). Dana A. Weiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Panama. Frequent co-authors include Heidi R. Riggio, Daniel J. Weigel, Daniel N. Jones, Amelia E. Talley, Jessica L. Malisch, Pumtiwitt C. McCarthy, Jaclyn E. Cañas‐Carrell, Naïma Moustaïd‐Moussa, Judith L. Fischer and Shanen M. Sherrer. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Personality and Individual Differences and Human Communication Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.