Dan Brown

23 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Dan Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Decision Sciences 19
  • Gender Studies 50
  • Clinical Psychology 110
  • Literature and Literary Theory 39
  • Communication 19
Replace Jacob Ware with:
Jacob Ware United States
Brian R. Taylor India
Lena Fanya Aeschbach Switzerland
Matthew Sharpe Australia
Laura Herrewijn Belgium
Véronique Campion‐Vincent France
Dane Acena United States
Maria Zimmermann Germany
Timothy Ballard Australia
Peter J. Neufeld United States
Dan Brown relative to Jacob Ware United States Jacob Ware's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Jacob Ware · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Brown. The network helps show where Dan Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Brown Line = papers co-authored together Dan Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198279
2 200647
3 201744
4 200532
5 201729
6 200528
7 201425
8 199522
9 199515
10 198113
11 20059
12 20158
13 20176
14 19876
15 20205
16 20064
17 20194
18 19793
19 19752
20 20171

About Dan Brown

Dan Brown is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Aerospace Engineering, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 24 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (2 papers) and Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (19 citations), Gender Studies (50 citations), Clinical Psychology (110 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations) and Communication (19 citations). Dan Brown has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jennings Bryant, Paul Comisky, Dolf Zillmann, Kevin Harrigan, Jackie Stapleton, Kevin R. Barton, Vance V. MacLaren, Tomáš Vinař, Broňa Brejová and Ming Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gambling Studies, The Aeronautical Journal, Journal of Communication, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics and Computer applications in the biosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact