Dane Acena

517 citations
9 papers · 340 · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dane Acena

9 papers receiving 326 citations

Dane Acena's Hit Papers

Disturbing the Peace: Experiencing and Mitigating Emerging Harassment in Social Virtual Reality 2022 · 89 citations
890+1+2Years since publication255075

Peers

Dane Acena
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Human-Computer Interaction 198
  • Literature and Literary Theory 42
  • Social Psychology 78
  • Applied Psychology 19
  • Clinical Psychology 70
Replace Gisela Gil-Egui with:
Gisela Gil-Egui United States
Robert Andrew Dunn United States
Maxwell Foxman United States
Bastian Kordyaka Germany
Charlotte Vonkeman Netherlands
Victoria McArthur Canada
Sonam Adinolf Australia
Lena Fanya Aeschbach Switzerland
April Tyack Australia
Katharina Jahn Germany
Dane Acena relative to Gisela Gil-Egui United States Gisela Gil-Egui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.2×
Gisela Gil-Egui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dane Acena

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dane Acena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dane Acena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dane Acena more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dane Acena

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dane Acena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dane Acena. The network helps show where Dane Acena may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Dane Acena, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dane Acena Line = papers co-authored together Dane Acena links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Disturbing the Peace: Experiencing and Mitigating Emerging Harassment in Social Virtual Reality
Hit paper breakdown →
202289
2 202155
3 202254
4 202239
5 202236
6 202127
7 202322
8 202015
9 20223

About Dane Acena

Dane Acena is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 9 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (7 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (1 paper), Software Engineering Research (1 paper) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (198 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations), Social Psychology (78 citations), Applied Psychology (19 citations) and Clinical Psychology (70 citations). Dane Acena has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Guo Freeman, Divine Maloney, Samaneh Zamanifard, Guo Freeman, Nathan J. McNeese, Lingyuan Li, Otis L. Owens, Jenay M. Beer, Karen Kane McDonnell and Taylor Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, American Journal of Health Promotion, SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility and CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact