D. W. Piper
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 0.2%
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
- Surgery top 1%
- Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Papers in
-
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 22
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 17
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment 7
- Surgery 77
- Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies 69
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis 15
- Co-authors
- Barbara H. FentonNicholas J. TalleyDon McNeilJ. McIntoshKaren BythMichael JonesA. WalanC B Lamers
- Journals
- Gastroenterology (25 papers)Gut (19 papers)The Medical Journal of Australia (18 papers)Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (16 papers)Digestive Diseases and Sciences (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
D. W. Piper
133 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Gastroenterology 1.6k
- Surgery 2.0k
- Pharmacy 98
- Pharmacology 292
- Nutrition and Dietetics 228
Countries citing papers authored by D. W. Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of D. W. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. W. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. W. Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. W. Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. W. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. W. Piper. The network helps show where D. W. Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. W. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 47 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 118 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 75 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 81 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 29 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1973 | 31 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1964 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1962 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1962 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1961 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1961 | 14 |
About D. W. Piper
D. W. Piper is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery, Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Small Animals, having authored 136 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (69 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (22 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (17 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (15 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (11 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (9 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (9 papers) and Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (1.6k citations), Surgery (2.0k citations), Pharmacy (98 citations), Pharmacology (292 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (228 citations). D. W. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Barbara H. Fenton, Nicholas J. Talley, Don McNeil, J. McIntosh, Karen Byth, Michael Jones, A. Walan, C B Lamers, John P. Bader and S. Eriksson. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Gut, The Medical Journal of Australia, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology and Digestive Diseases and Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.