D. Karcher

75 papers receiving 878 citations

Peers

D. Karcher
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Neurology 103
  • Neurology 176
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 165
  • Clinical Biochemistry 61
  • Biochemistry 57
Replace CHARLES E. LUMSDEN with:
CHARLES E. LUMSDEN United Kingdom
Song‐Yi Yao United States
Martin Weiß United States
Hossein Fakhrai-Rad Sweden
Patricia Mathieu United States
Kazuhiro Kitada Japan
Moshe Lahav United States
Katie A. Welch United States
Sharon Frase United States
J. Vivian Wells United States
D. Karcher relative to CHARLES E. LUMSDEN United Kingdom CHARLES E. LUMSDEN's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14×
CHARLES E. LUMSDEN · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Karcher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Karcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Karcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Karcher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Karcher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Karcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Karcher. The network helps show where D. Karcher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Karcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Karcher Line = papers co-authored together D. Karcher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1960142
2 199470
3 197951
4 196250
5 197650
6 195949
7 199044
8 198434
9 197833
10 198233
11 198131
12 196129
13 197929
14 196028
15 198221
16 198621
17 198418
18 195916
19 197016
20
Isolation and characterization of IgG globulins in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis.
197216

About D. Karcher

D. Karcher is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Neurology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virology and Viral Diseases (12 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (8 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (6 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (5 papers), RNA regulation and disease (5 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (103 citations), Neurology (176 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (165 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (61 citations) and Biochemistry (57 citations). D. Karcher has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include A. Löwenthal, MARC VAN SANDE, N. Chamoles, J. Gheuens, Arthur Donny Strosberg, Armand Löwenthal, Klaus Kitz, H. G. Terheggen, Hans Lassmann and Wolfgang Zeman. Their work appears in journals such as Clinica Chimica Acta, Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurology, Acta Neuropathologica and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact