D. I. A. MacLeod
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Jenny M. BostenMary HayhoeRobert M. BoyntonPeter LennieH. B. BarlowA. van MeeterenEd VulAlexandra E. Boehm
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (24 papers)Color Science and Applications (13 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
D. I. A. MacLeod
29 papers receiving 641 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 596
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 235
- Social Psychology 165
- Molecular Biology 124
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 102
Countries citing papers authored by D. I. A. MacLeod
This map shows the geographic impact of D. I. A. MacLeod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. I. A. MacLeod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. I. A. MacLeod more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. I. A. MacLeod
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. I. A. MacLeod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. I. A. MacLeod. The network helps show where D. I. A. MacLeod may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. I. A. MacLeod
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. I. A. MacLeod. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. I. A. MacLeod based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. I. A. MacLeod. D. I. A. MacLeod is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | The Black Hole Test for Retinal Light Spread | 1 |
| 14 | 63 | |
| 15 | Equiluminance: Spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive cones | 1 |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | A displaced Stiles-Crawford effect associated with an eccentric pupil. | 24 |
| 18 | 78 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Microscopes and eye fatigue. | 3 |
About D. I. A. MacLeod
D. I. A. MacLeod is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (24 papers), Color Science and Applications (13 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (596 citations), Social Psychology (165 citations) and Ophthalmology (71 citations). D. I. A. MacLeod has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jenny M. Bosten, Mary Hayhoe, Robert M. Boynton, Peter Lennie, H. B. Barlow, A. van Meeteren, Ed Vul, Alexandra E. Boehm, A. B. Bonds and Andrew Stockman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology and Annual Review of Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.