Mary Hayhoe
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.1%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 0.2%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.05%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Dana H. BallardMichael F. LandJeff B. PelzRajesh P. N. RaoD.H. BallardBrian SullivanConstantin A. RothkopfPolly K. Pook
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (105 papers)Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (55 papers)Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (37 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Mary Hayhoe
165 papers receiving 9.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Cognitive Neuroscience 6.7k
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2.5k
- Human-Computer Interaction 2.3k
- Social Psychology 1.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 982
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Hayhoe
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Hayhoe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Hayhoe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Hayhoe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Hayhoe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Hayhoe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Hayhoe. The network helps show where Mary Hayhoe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Hayhoe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Hayhoe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Hayhoe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Hayhoe. Mary Hayhoe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | A soft barrier model for predicting human visuomotor behavior in a driving task | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 58 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?breakdown → | 686 |
| 17 | Modeling Saccadic Targeting in Visual Search | 36 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Saturation of the cone system by small steady backgrounds (A) | 3 |
About Mary Hayhoe
Mary Hayhoe is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 171 papers that have together received 9.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (105 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (55 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (37 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (2.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (6.7k citations) and Sensory Systems (634 citations). Mary Hayhoe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dana H. Ballard, Michael F. Land, Jeff B. Pelz, Rajesh P. N. Rao, D.H. Ballard, Brian Sullivan, Constantin A. Rothkopf, Polly K. Pook, M. F. Land and Benjamin W. Tatler. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.