Jenny M. Bosten
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- J. D. MollonAdam J. Lawrance-OwenPatrick T. GoodbournGary BargaryRuth HoggAnna FranklinAlexandra E. BoehmD. I. A. MacLeod
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (30 papers)Color perception and design (20 papers)Color Science and Applications (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jenny M. Bosten
48 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Cognitive Neuroscience 714
- Social Psychology 371
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 310
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 197
- Molecular Biology 117
Countries citing papers authored by Jenny M. Bosten
This map shows the geographic impact of Jenny M. Bosten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenny M. Bosten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenny M. Bosten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jenny M. Bosten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenny M. Bosten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenny M. Bosten. The network helps show where Jenny M. Bosten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenny M. Bosten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenny M. Bosten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenny M. Bosten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenny M. Bosten. Jenny M. Bosten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 80 | |
| 9 | 126 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | Cortical Patterning Genes are Associated with Individual Differences in Visual Orientation Perception | 1 |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 57 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Jenny M. Bosten
Jenny M. Bosten is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (30 papers), Color perception and design (20 papers) and Color Science and Applications (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (714 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (310 citations) and Social Psychology (371 citations). Jenny M. Bosten has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. D. Mollon, Adam J. Lawrance-Owen, Patrick T. Goodbourn, Gary Bargary, Ruth Hogg, Anna Franklin, Alexandra E. Boehm, D. I. A. MacLeod, Alice E. Skelton and Osman B. Kavcar. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.