Anne Roeters

711 citations
22 papers · 433 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Roeters

18 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Anne Roeters
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Gender Studies 142
  • Sociology and Political Science 305
  • Demography 71
  • Social Psychology 92
  • General Health Professions 86
Replace Amy Kroska with:
Amy Kroska United States
Sarah M. Kendig United States
Mareike Bünning Germany
Eija Sevón Finland
Seongryeol Ryu United States
Brenda L. Seery United States
Margaret Ward Australia
Carolyn Y. Tubbs United States
Laura L. Miller United States
Anita Ilta Garey United States
Anne Roeters relative to Amy Kroska United States Amy Kroska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Amy Kroska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Roeters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Roeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Roeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Roeters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Roeters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Roeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Roeters. The network helps show where Anne Roeters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Anne Roeters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Roeters Line = papers co-authored together Anne Roeters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201084
2 201858
3 201656
4 200955
5 201434
6 201531
7 201628
8 201215
9 201114
10 201412
11 201911
12 201811
13 201010
14 20136
15 20154
16
Time use in the Netherlands
20192
17
Looking after the household and family care
20191
18
Work schedules, childcare and well-being
20131
19 20160
20 20160

About Anne Roeters

Anne Roeters is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Demography, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (16 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (11 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (142 citations), Sociology and Political Science (305 citations), Demography (71 citations), Social Psychology (92 citations) and General Health Professions (86 citations). Anne Roeters has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Tanja van der Lippe, Esther S. Kluwer, Pablo Gracia, Mara A. Yerkes, Janeen Baxter, Lyn Craig, Jornt J. Mandemakers, Marieke Voorpostel, Vanessa May and Anna Rönkä. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Community Work & Family, Social Indicators Research, Journal of Child and Family Studies and International Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact