Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Retirement adjustment: A review of theoretical and empirical advancements.
2011345 citationsMo Wang, Kène Henkens et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Kène Henkens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kène Henkens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kène Henkens more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kène Henkens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kène Henkens. The network helps show where Kène Henkens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kène Henkens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kène Henkens.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kène Henkens based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kène Henkens. Kène Henkens is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Henkens, Kène, H.P. van Dalen, David J. Ekerdt, et al.. (2017). What we need to know about retirement : Pressing issues for the coming decade. Other publications TiSEM.2 indexed citations
10.
Henkens, Kène, Hanna van Solinge, Marleen Damman, & Ellen Dingemans. (2016). Taken by surprise. How older workers struggle with a higher retirement age. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 32(7). 1–2.1 indexed citations
11.
Henkens, Kène, Hanna van Solinge, Marleen Damman, & Ellen Dingemans. (2016). Langer doorwerken valt nog niet mee. KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)). 32(2). 1–4.3 indexed citations
Dalen, H.P. van, Kène Henkens, & Mo Wang. (2014). Recharging or Retiring Older Workers? Uncovering the Age-Based Strategies of European Employers. Other publications TiSEM.
15.
Dalen, H.P. van & Kène Henkens. (2013). Hardnekkige beelden over armoede onder ouderen. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 29(5). 1–3.1 indexed citations
16.
Dalen, H.P. van & Kène Henkens. (2012). What is on a Demographer's Mind? A Worldwide Survey. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Dalen, H.P. van & Kène Henkens. (2004). Early Retirement Reform: Can It Work and Will It Work?. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
18.
Liefbroer, Aart C., et al.. (2001). Oude en nieuwe allochtonen in Nederland: een demografisch profiel.6 indexed citations
19.
Henkens, Kène, et al.. (2000). Wat doen werkgevers bij krapte. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 960–962.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.