Craig Pohl

42.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Craig Pohl is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Craig Pohl has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Genetics and 1 paper in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Craig Pohl's work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers). Craig Pohl is often cited by papers focused on Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers). Craig Pohl collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Craig Pohl's co-authors include Elaine R. Mardis, Michael C. Wendl, Michael D. McLellan, Timothy J. Ley, Richard K. Wilson, David E. Larson, Joelle Kalicki, John W. Wallis, Xiaoqi Shi and Robert S. Fulton and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Methods, BMC Bioinformatics and Human Mutation.

In The Last Decade

Craig Pohl

6 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation

2009 997 citations Ken Chen, John W. Wallis et al. Nature Methods profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Craig Pohl United States	5	888	542	324	248	81	6	1.3k
Bethan Pritchard United Kingdom	4	818 0.9×	586 1.1×	303 0.9×	212 0.9×	14 0.2×	5	1.5k
Matthias Harbers Japan	21	1.7k 1.9×	365 0.7×	156 0.5×	315 1.3×	40 0.5×	43	2.0k
Yueyuan Zheng China	12	1.4k 1.6×	155 0.3×	335 1.0×	378 1.5×	56 0.7×	29	1.9k
John T. Tossberg United States	16	955 1.1×	155 0.3×	554 1.7×	405 1.6×	29 0.4×	26	1.5k
A. V. Zelenin Russia	20	819 0.9×	202 0.4×	494 1.5×	84 0.3×	24 0.3×	100	1.3k
Yong Gu Cho South Korea	22	1.0k 1.1×	706 1.3×	880 2.7×	145 0.6×	25 0.3×	39	2.0k
Maarten H. Stuiver Netherlands	16	906 1.0×	250 0.5×	470 1.5×	47 0.2×	20 0.2×	19	1.3k
John W. Wallis United States	10	1.5k 1.7×	595 1.1×	448 1.4×	346 1.4×	17 0.2×	12	2.0k
Jonathan Gordon United States	17	1.1k 1.2×	253 0.5×	595 1.8×	116 0.5×	13 0.2×	26	1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Pohl

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Pohl

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Pohl. The network helps show where Craig Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Pohl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Pohl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Pohl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Pohl. Craig Pohl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Vats, Pankaj, Shawn Leonard, Lee Trani, et al.. (2022). de novo variant calling identifies cancer mutation signatures in the 1000 Genomes Project. Human Mutation. 43(12). 1979–1993. 6 indexed citations

2.

Pohl, Craig, Jan A.K.W. Kiel, Arnold J. M. Driessen, Roel A. L. Bovenberg, & Yvonne Nygård. (2016). CRISPR/Cas9 Based Genome Editing of Penicillium chrysogenum. ACS Synthetic Biology. 5(7). 754–764. 248 indexed citations

3.

Chen, Ken, John W. Wallis, Michael D. McLellan, et al.. (2009). BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nature Methods. 6(9). 677–681. 997 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Wendl, Michael C., Scott M. Smith, Craig Pohl, et al.. (2007). Design and implementation of a generalized laboratory data model. BMC Bioinformatics. 8(1). 362–362. 8 indexed citations

5.

Wilson, Rebecca K., Timothy J. Ley, F. Sessions Cole, et al.. (2003). Mutational Profiling in the Human Genome. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 68(0). 23–30. 8 indexed citations

6.

Cook, Lisa, et al.. (2000). Modification of a commercially available DNA sequencer to increase sample throughput. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. 19(2). 101–106. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact