Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Deegan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Deegan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Deegan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Deegan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Deegan. The network helps show where Craig Deegan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Deegan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Deegan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Deegan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Deegan. Craig Deegan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Islam, Muhammad Azizul, Craig Deegan, & Rob Gray. (2018). Social compliance audits and multinational corporation supply chain: evidence from a study of the rituals of social audits. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Haque, Shamima, Craig Deegan, & Robert Inglis. (2015). Demand for, and Impediments to, the Disclosure of Information About Climate Change-Related Corporate Governance Practices. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
6.
Islam, Muhammad Azizul, Craig Deegan, & Rob Gray. (2014). Social Audits and Multinational Company Supply Chain: A Study of Rituals of Social Audits in the Bangladesh Garment Industry. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).4 indexed citations
7.
Deegan, Craig & Muhammad Azizul Islam. (2014). An Exploration of NGO and Media Efforts to Influence Workplace Practices and Associated Accountability within Global Supply Chains. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
8.
Deegan, Craig & Muhammad Azizul Islam. (2012). Corporate Commitment to Sustainability – Is it All Hot Air? An Australian Review of the Linkage between Executive Pay and Sustainable Performance. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).1 indexed citations
Deegan, Craig & Jeffrey Unerman. (2011). Financial Accounting Theory : European Edition Ed. 2.9 indexed citations
11.
Islam, Muhammad Azizul & Craig Deegan. (2010). Media Pressures and Corporate Disclosure of Social Responsibility Performance Information: A Study of Two Global Clothing and Sports Retail Companies. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).10 indexed citations
12.
Islam, Muhammad Azizul & Craig Deegan. (2010). Social responsibility disclosure practices : evidence from Bangladesh. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).8 indexed citations
Deegan, Craig, et al.. (2008). Finding information about contaminated sites in Australia: There has to be a better way. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 25(4). 284–297.2 indexed citations
Deegan, Craig & Jeffrey Unerman. (2006). Financial accounting theory: European edition. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).60 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.