Craig Crowley
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 1%
- Co-authors
- Arthur D. LevinsonHeidi PhillipsMerry NishimuraSusan D. SpencerKaren ChenDavid L. SheltonSharon Pitts-MeekStephen B. McMahon
- Topics
- Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (4 papers)Hepatitis B Virus Studies (3 papers)Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Craig Crowley
16 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Molecular Biology 1.7k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 980
- Oncology 742
- Cancer Research 424
- Developmental Neuroscience 349
Countries citing papers authored by Craig Crowley
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Crowley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Crowley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Crowley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Crowley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Crowley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Crowley. The network helps show where Craig Crowley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Crowley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Crowley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Crowley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Crowley. Craig Crowley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 135 | |
| 2 | 105 | |
| 3 | 216 | |
| 4 | 175 | |
| 5 | 307 | |
| 6 | 70 | |
| 7 | Mice lacking nerve growth factor display perinatal loss of sensory and sympathetic neurons yet develop basal forebrain cholinergic neuronsbreakdown → | 874 |
| 8 | Benzodiazepine Peptidomimetics: Potent Inhibitors of Ras Farnesylation In Animal Cellsbreakdown → | 522 |
| 9 | 340 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 77 | |
| 16 | 59 |
About Craig Crowley
Craig Crowley is a scholar working on Immunology and Allergy, Developmental Neuroscience and Biotechnology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (4 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (3 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (349 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (980 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (197 citations). Craig Crowley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur D. Levinson, Heidi Phillips, Merry Nishimura, Susan D. Spencer, Karen Chen, David L. Shelton, Sharon Pitts-Meek, Stephen B. McMahon, B. K. Lucas and Marc A. Shuman. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Cell and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.